Skip to content

MON-4033: Add OpenShiftMetricsConfig#2726

Open
danielmellado wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
danielmellado:openshift-metrics-config
Open

MON-4033: Add OpenShiftMetricsConfig#2726
danielmellado wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
danielmellado:openshift-metrics-config

Conversation

@danielmellado
Copy link
Contributor

This commit adds configuration options for the openshift-state-metrics
agent in config/v1alpha1

The new struct supports:

  • nodeSelector: node scheduling constraints
  • resources: compute resource requests and limits
  • tolerations: pod tolerations
  • topologySpreadConstraints: pod distribution across topology domains

Signed-off-by: Daniel Mellado dmellado@fedoraproject.org

This commit adds configuration options for the openshift-state-metrics
agent in config/v1alpha1

The new struct supports:

- nodeSelector: node scheduling constraints
- resources: compute resource requests and limits
- tolerations: pod tolerations
- topologySpreadConstraints: pod distribution across topology domains

Signed-off-by: Daniel Mellado <dmellado@fedoraproject.org>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Feb 25, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 25, 2026

@danielmellado: This pull request references MON-4033 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

This commit adds configuration options for the openshift-state-metrics
agent in config/v1alpha1

The new struct supports:

  • nodeSelector: node scheduling constraints
  • resources: compute resource requests and limits
  • tolerations: pod tolerations
  • topologySpreadConstraints: pod distribution across topology domains

Signed-off-by: Daniel Mellado dmellado@fedoraproject.org

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 25, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces OpenShiftStateMetricsConfig as a new configuration type within the ClusterMonitoring API (v1alpha1). The change adds the OpenShiftStateMetricsConfig field to ClusterMonitoringSpec with support for NodeSelector, Resources, Tolerations, and TopologySpreadConstraints. Corresponding deepcopy and swagger documentation methods were generated to support the new type. The CRD manifest was updated with detailed validation constraints for the new configuration field, including restrictions on resource quantities, array sizes, and nested properties. Comprehensive test cases were added to validate both successful configurations and validation failure scenarios.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'MON-4033: Add OpenShiftMetricsConfig' accurately describes the main change: introducing a new configuration type for openshift-state-metrics agent.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, clearly explaining the addition of configuration options for openshift-state-metrics with details about supported fields.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings (stacked PR)
  • 📝 Generate docstrings (commit on current branch)
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 golangci-lint (2.5.0)

Error: build linters: unable to load custom analyzer "kubeapilinter": tools/_output/bin/kube-api-linter.so, plugin: not implemented
The command is terminated due to an error: build linters: unable to load custom analyzer "kubeapilinter": tools/_output/bin/kube-api-linter.so, plugin: not implemented

Tip

Try Coding Plans. Let us write the prompt for your AI agent so you can ship faster (with fewer bugs).
Share your feedback on Discord.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 25, 2026

Hello @danielmellado! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 25, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 25, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign joelspeed for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
config/v1alpha1/tests/clustermonitorings.config.openshift.io/ClusterMonitoringConfig.yaml (1)

578-591: Make the duplicate topology spread assertion more specific.

Line 591 uses a very broad substring ("Duplicate value"), which can hide failures from the wrong field/path.

🔧 Suggested test assertion tightening
-      expectedError: "Duplicate value"
+      expectedError: 'spec.openShiftStateMetricsConfig.topologySpreadConstraints[1]: Duplicate value'
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In
`@config/v1alpha1/tests/clustermonitorings.config.openshift.io/ClusterMonitoringConfig.yaml`
around lines 578 - 591, The test "Should reject OpenShiftStateMetricsConfig with
duplicate topologySpreadConstraints" is asserting a too-generic error
("Duplicate value"); update the expectedError to assert the precise validation
message and path (for example include
spec.openShiftStateMetricsConfig.topologySpreadConstraints and the duplicate
topologyKey/value) so the test verifies the exact field/path that failed (target
the openShiftStateMetricsConfig.topologySpreadConstraints duplicate topologyKey
error string rather than the broad "Duplicate value").
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Nitpick comments:
In
`@config/v1alpha1/tests/clustermonitorings.config.openshift.io/ClusterMonitoringConfig.yaml`:
- Around line 578-591: The test "Should reject OpenShiftStateMetricsConfig with
duplicate topologySpreadConstraints" is asserting a too-generic error
("Duplicate value"); update the expectedError to assert the precise validation
message and path (for example include
spec.openShiftStateMetricsConfig.topologySpreadConstraints and the duplicate
topologyKey/value) so the test verifies the exact field/path that failed (target
the openShiftStateMetricsConfig.topologySpreadConstraints duplicate topologyKey
error string rather than the broad "Duplicate value").

ℹ️ Review info

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

Knowledge base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8713f3f and 8412fe0.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • config/v1alpha1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_10_config-operator_01_clustermonitorings.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • config/v1alpha1/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/clustermonitorings.config.openshift.io/ClusterMonitoringConfig.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/**
  • openapi/generated_openapi/zz_generated.openapi.go is excluded by !openapi/**
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • config/v1alpha1/tests/clustermonitorings.config.openshift.io/ClusterMonitoringConfig.yaml
  • config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go
  • config/v1alpha1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go
  • config/v1alpha1/zz_generated.swagger_doc_generated.go
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_10_config-operator_01_clustermonitorings.crd.yaml

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 25, 2026

@danielmellado: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants