Skip to content

Conversation

@marslanabdulrauf
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This is Backport PR of: #37825

There is a singleton SplitMongoModuleStore instance that is returned
whenever we call the ubiquitous modulestore() function (wrapped in a
MixedModuleStore). During initialization, SplitMongoModuleStore sets
up a small handful of XBlock runtime services that are intended to be
shared globally: i18n, fs, cache.

When we get an individual block back from the store using get_item(),
SplitMongoModuleStore creates a SplitModuleStoreRuntime using
SplitMongoModuleStore.create_runtime(). These runtimes are intended to
be modified on a per-item, and later per-user basis (using
prepare_runtime_for_user()).

Prior to this commit, the create_runtime() method was assigning the
globally shared SplitMongoModuleStore.services dict directly to the
newly instantiated SplitModuleStoreRuntime. This meant that even though
each block had its own _services dict, they were all in fact pointing
to the same underlying object. This exposed us to a risk of multiple
threads contaminating each other's SplitModuleStoreRuntime services
when deployed under load in multithreaded mode. We believe this led to
a race condition that caused student submissions to be mis-scored in
some cases.

This commit makes a copy of the SplitMongoModuleStore.services dict for
each SplitModuleStoreRuntime. The baseline global services are still
shared, but other per-item and per-user services are now better
isolated from each other.

This commit also includes a small modification to the PartitionService,
which up until this point had relied on the (incorrect) shared instance
behavior. The details are provided in the comments in the
PartitionService __init__().

It's worth noting that the historical rationale for having a singleton
ModuleStore instance is that the ModuleStore used to be extremely
expensive to initialize. This was because at one point, the init
process required reading entire XML-based courses into memory, or
pre-computing complex field inheritance caches. This is no longer the
case, and SplitMongoModuleStore initialization is in the 1-2 ms range,
with most of that being for PyMongo's connection setup. We should try
to fully remove the global singleton in the Verawood release cycle in
order to make this kind of bug less likely.
@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label Jan 8, 2026
@openedx-webhooks
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, @marslanabdulrauf!

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/wg-maintenance-edx-platform.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.
🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads
🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

Details
Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

@mphilbrick211 mphilbrick211 moved this from Needs Triage to In Eng Review in Contributions Jan 8, 2026
@ormsbee ormsbee merged commit 5d33a79 into openedx:release/ulmo Jan 8, 2026
49 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Eng Review to Done in Contributions Jan 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants