Skip to content

docs: add missing sandbox category to examples page#3453

Open
AbdulSamad94 wants to merge 2 commits into
openai:mainfrom
AbdulSamad94:docs/add-sandbox-examples
Open

docs: add missing sandbox category to examples page#3453
AbdulSamad94 wants to merge 2 commits into
openai:mainfrom
AbdulSamad94:docs/add-sandbox-examples

Conversation

@AbdulSamad94
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The sandbox examples category was missing from docs/examples.md (and all translated versions) despite being a substantial part of the repo, it has its own dedicated doc page (sandbox_agents.md), is listed in the site nav, and contains 11+ standalone examples, cloud backend extensions, workflow examples, and tutorials.

This PR adds the sandbox entry in alphabetical order (between research_bot and tools) across all four language files (en, ja, ko, zh), with a brief description of what each example covers and a cross-link to the sandbox quickstart page.

@seratch seratch added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label May 18, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 348161e6e9

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/ja/examples.md Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants