Skip to content

[WIP] Start implementation of plugin ecosystem for objectql core#367

Closed
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
copilot/start-implementation-plugin-ecosystem
Closed

[WIP] Start implementation of plugin ecosystem for objectql core#367
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
copilot/start-implementation-plugin-ecosystem

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Feb 10, 2026

Cloud agent has begun work on Start implementation and will update this pull request as work progresses.

Original prompt

Start implementation

The user has attached the following file paths as relevant context:

  • .github/copilot-instructions.md
  • .github/copilot-instructions.md
[Chronological Review: The conversation began with the user requesting an evaluation of how the core project @objectql/core could function as a plugin ecosystem for @objectstack/objectql without replacing it. The user then inquired about the API gateway's definition within @objectstack and the differences in implementation. They raised concerns about whether these components were core requirements and if they should be migrated upstream. The user noted that the core had recently introduced @objectstack/plugin-auth, which focuses on authentication and multi-tenancy, indicating these are core responsibilities. Finally, the user requested a complete AI prompt and indicated they would modify the upstream project before starting implementation.]

[Intent Mapping:

  1. "评估本项目内核@objectql/core 如何成为 @objectstack/objectql 的插件生态,而不是替换 @objectstack/objectql。" - User wants to explore the plugin ecosystem for @objectql/core.
  2. "API 网关不是应该在 @objectstack 中定义了吗?" - User questions the definition of the API gateway and its implementation.
  3. "但是 内核 刚刚引入 @objectstack/plugin-auth ,开始关注认证和多租户,这些都是内核要处理的。" - User highlights the recent focus on authentication and multi-tenancy as core responsibilities.
  4. "你现在应该给我写完整的ai提示词,我先去改上游项目。" - User requests a complete AI prompt for modifications to the upstream project.
  5. "Start implementation" - User indicates readiness to begin implementation.]

[Technical Inventory:

  • @objectql/core: The core project being discussed.
  • @objectstack/objectql: The project that @objectql/core is intended to complement as a plugin ecosystem.
  • @objectstack/plugin-auth: A recent addition to the core focusing on authentication and multi-tenancy.]

[Code Archaeology:

  • The user is currently working on the file /Users/steedos/Documents/GitHub/objectql/packages/foundation/core/package.json, which is likely related to the core project configuration.
  • Specific lines of code or functions were not detailed in the conversation.]

[Progress Assessment:

  • The user has identified areas for improvement and integration between @objectql/core and @objectstack/objectql.
  • They have acknowledged the introduction of new features related to authentication and multi-tenancy.
  • The user is preparing to modify the upstream project before starting implementation.]

[Context Validation: All critical information for continuation is captured, including user requests for evaluation, clarification on API definitions, and readiness to implement changes.]

[Recent Commands Analysis:

  • Last Agent Commands: The user requested a complete AI prompt and indicated readiness to start implementation.
  • Tool Results Summary: The conversation has focused on evaluating the integration of @objectql/core with @objectstack/objectql and the implications of recent changes.
  • Pre-Summary State: The agent was actively discussing the implementation of features and modifications to the upstream project.
  • Operation Context: These commands were executed to clarify the user's goals and prepare for the next steps in the project.]
1. Conversation Overview: - Primary Objectives: - "评估本项目内核@objectql/core 如何成为 @objectstack/objectql 的插件生态,而不是替换 @objectstack/objectql。" - "API 网关不是应该在 @objectstack 中定义了吗?" - "但是 内核 刚刚引入 @objectstack/plugin-auth ,开始关注认证和多租户,这些都是内核要处理的。" - "你现在应该给我写完整的ai提示词,我先去改上游项目。" - "Start implementation" - Session Context: The conversation has revolved around the integration of @objectql/core as a plugin ecosystem for @objectstack/objectql, with discussions on API definitions and core responsibilities. - User Intent Evolution: The user transitioned from evaluating the project structure to preparing for implementation after identifying necessary modifications.
  1. Technical Foundation:
  • @objectql/core: The core project under discussion, intended to work alongside @objectstack/objectql.
  • @objectstack/objectql: The project that @objectql/core aims to enhance through a plugin ecosystem.
  • @objectstack/plugin-auth: A new plugin focusing on authentication and multi-tenancy.
  1. Codebase Status:
  • /Users/steedos/Documents/GitHub/objectql/packages/foundation/core/package.json:
    • Purpose: Configuration file for the core project.
    • Current State: The user is currently reviewing this file.
    • Key Code Segments: Not specified in the conversation.
    • Dependencies: Related to the overall structure of the @objectql ecosystem.
  1. Problem Resolution:
  • Issues Encountered: Clarification needed on the API gateway's definition and its implementation.
  • Solutions Implemented: User has identified the need for modifications to the upstream project.
  • Debugging Context: Ongoing discussions about core responsibilities and plugin integration.
  • Lessons Learned: Importance of defining roles within the ecosystem and ensuring proper integration.
  1. Prog...

Created from VS Code.


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 10, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
objectql Ready Ready Preview, Comment Feb 10, 2026 10:04am

Request Review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants