Skip to content

Conversation

@Uaitt
Copy link
Contributor

@Uaitt Uaitt commented Apr 18, 2025

Description

There's a broken link in the Running TypeScript with a runner article

@Uaitt Uaitt requested a review from a team as a code owner April 18, 2025 07:06
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 18, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 18, 2025 7:07am

@avivkeller
Copy link
Member

Fast tracking since this is an extremely minor change

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 18, 2025

Lighthouse Results

URL Performance Accessibility Best Practices SEO Report
/en 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 91 🔗
/en/about 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 91 🔗
/en/about/previous-releases 🟢 99 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 92 🔗
/en/download 🟢 98 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 91 🔗
/en/blog 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 96 🟢 92 🔗

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.61%. Comparing base (294a102) to head (f9a0516).

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7665   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.61%   74.61%           
=======================================
  Files          96       96           
  Lines        7685     7685           
  Branches      192      192           
=======================================
  Hits         5734     5734           
  Misses       1949     1949           
  Partials        2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@araujogui araujogui enabled auto-merge April 18, 2025 11:41
@avivkeller avivkeller added the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Apr 18, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Apr 18, 2025
@araujogui araujogui added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 18, 2025
@avivkeller avivkeller removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Apr 18, 2025
@avivkeller avivkeller enabled auto-merge April 18, 2025 12:41
@avivkeller avivkeller disabled auto-merge April 18, 2025 12:41
@avivkeller avivkeller added the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Apr 18, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Apr 18, 2025
@avivkeller avivkeller enabled auto-merge April 18, 2025 13:52
@avivkeller avivkeller added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 18, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Apr 18, 2025
@avivkeller
Copy link
Member

See #7667 for why the merge queue is failing

@avivkeller avivkeller added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 19, 2025
Merged via the queue into nodejs:main with commit c32c588 Apr 19, 2025
33 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fast-track Fast Tracking PRs

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants