fix(content): unify usage of i.e. and e.g.

[Uaitt]

Description

This PR just corrects a small typo on the Node.js with WebAssembly article.

Basically, ie becomes i.e.

Why am I proposing this?
I am in the process or reading all the Node.js getting started articles, and I have seen that in all other places in the docs the form i.e. is used (as seen here: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Anodejs%2Fnodejs.org%20%22i.e.%22&type=code).

While the form ie can be considered correct, a widely accepted rule of thumb is to be consistent, so either i.e. or ie everywhere. (https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/407270/is-ie-acceptable-or-must-it-always-be-i-e)

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Apr 19, 2025 7:30am

[avivkeller]

please apply it to all occurrences:

https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Anodejs%2Fnodejs.org+%2F%5Cbie%5Cb%2F&type=code

https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Anodejs%2Fnodejs.org+%2F%5Cbeg%5Cb%2F&type=code

[Uaitt]

@avivkeller I have fixed all the other occurrences :)

[github-actions]

Lighthouse Results

URL	Performance	Accessibility	Best Practices	SEO	Report
/en	🟢 99	🟢 100	🟢 100	🟢 91	🔗
/en/about	🟢 100	🟢 100	🟢 100	🟢 91	🔗
/en/about/previous-releases	🟢 99	🟢 100	🟢 100	🟢 92	🔗
/en/download	🟠 86	🟢 100	🟢 100	🟢 91	🔗
/en/blog	🟢 100	🟢 100	🟢 96	🟢 92	🔗

[avivkeller]

@Uaitt can you rebase? We updated some checks recently, and they need to be applied here (but they won't fail).

[Uaitt]

@avivkeller done

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.62%. Comparing base (c32c588) to head (5863a1c).

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7653      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   74.61%   74.62%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          96       96              
  Lines        7689     7689              
  Branches      192      192              
==========================================
+ Hits         5737     5738       +1     
+ Misses       1950     1949       -1     
  Partials        2        2              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.