docs(readme): refresh structure with Mermaid diagram and new sections#510
Merged
nanotaboada merged 2 commits intomasterfrom Mar 9, 2026
Merged
docs(readme): refresh structure with Mermaid diagram and new sections#510nanotaboada merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
nanotaboada merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
WalkthroughAdded a new Copilot/Custom instructions file and a CLAUDE.md, and replaced the previous minimal README with an expanded, structured documentation set covering architecture, API reference, setup, Docker, releases, environment variables, testing, and contributing. (50 words) Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #510 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 3 3
Lines 110 110
=========================================
Hits 110 110
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 117-127: Update the architecture diagram mapping so that aiocache
points to services instead of routes: replace the entry "aiocache --> routes"
with "aiocache --> services" to reflect that caching is implemented as a
service-layer concern and keep the diagram consistent with the rest of the PR;
confirm the change in the same mapping block that contains entries like routes,
databases, services, models, and schemas.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: cee32275-21f4-4471-bf49-a6aeb16b72d0
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
assets/images/structure.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg,!**/assets/**assets/images/swagger.pngis excluded by!**/*.png,!**/assets/**
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/copilot-instructions.mdCLAUDE.mdREADME.md
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
README.md (1)
126-126:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 MinorThe caching layer attribution remains incorrect in the architecture diagram.
Line 126 still shows
aiocache --> routes, but Line 66 explicitly states that services handle "cache management". This inconsistency was flagged in a previous review and the commit message indicates an attempt to fix it, but the diagram still pointsaiocacheatroutesinstead ofservices.📐 Proposed fix
- aiocache --> routes + aiocache --> services🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@README.md` at line 126, The architecture diagram in README still points aiocache at routes; update the diagram and any diagram source so that aiocache points to services (change the arrow/edge from "aiocache --> routes" to "aiocache --> services") and ensure the surrounding text that mentions cache ownership (the sentence near Line 66 about services handling "cache management") remains consistent with the diagram; verify there are no other occurrences of "aiocache --> routes" in the README or diagram source and update them to reference "services" instead.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 150: Update the README sentence that describes the layered flow ("routes
→ services → schemas → databases") to remove "in-memory caching" from the
responsibilities of routes and instead state that services own cache management
(matching the earlier Line 66 wording). Concretely, edit the phrase "routes
handle HTTP mapping, validation, and in-memory caching" to something like
"routes handle HTTP mapping and validation; services handle business logic and
cache management," while keeping the rest of the description about schemas
defining the ORM model and databases managing the async session.
---
Duplicate comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 126: The architecture diagram in README still points aiocache at routes;
update the diagram and any diagram source so that aiocache points to services
(change the arrow/edge from "aiocache --> routes" to "aiocache --> services")
and ensure the surrounding text that mentions cache ownership (the sentence near
Line 66 about services handling "cache management") remains consistent with the
diagram; verify there are no other occurrences of "aiocache --> routes" in the
README or diagram source and update them to reference "services" instead.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
nanotaboada
force-pushed
the
docs/readme-refresh
branch
from
4130fdd to
1cd83a9
Compare
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
143-150: Use distinct notation for dependency direction vs request flow.This section reuses
→for two opposite concepts: dependency edges in the diagram/legend (services → routes) and runtime flow in the layered description (routes → services). Even with the legend, that direction flip is hard to scan. Consider rewriting one side with explicit wording like “routes depend on services” or changing the diagram notation so both read left-to-right the same way.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@README.md` around lines 143 - 150, The README uses the same arrow symbol (→) for both import-time dependencies and runtime/request flow, which causes ambiguity; update the text to use distinct notation or explicit wording so directions are unambiguous — e.g., keep solid/dotted arrow legend for diagrams (references: "services → routes", "fastapi" app → "main") but rewrite the layered architecture sentence to explicit phrases like "routes depend on services" or "HTTP requests flow from routes to services" (references: "routes → services → schemas → databases", "main" composition root) or alternatively change one set of arrows to a different symbol so both read consistently left-to-right.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 143-150: The README uses the same arrow symbol (→) for both
import-time dependencies and runtime/request flow, which causes ambiguity;
update the text to use distinct notation or explicit wording so directions are
unambiguous — e.g., keep solid/dotted arrow legend for diagrams (references:
"services → routes", "fastapi" app → "main") but rewrite the layered
architecture sentence to explicit phrases like "routes depend on services" or
"HTTP requests flow from routes to services" (references: "routes → services →
schemas → databases", "main" composition root) or alternatively change one set
of arrows to a different symbol so both read consistently left-to-right.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change is
Summary by CodeRabbit