npm event-stream supply-chain vulnerability(2018)

[shreyashitole02]

This is the updated PR

[continue]

Learn more

---

All Green is an AI agent that automatically:

✅ Addresses code review comments

✅ Fixes failing CI checks

✅ Resolves merge conflicts

[stevechristeycoley]

Automated Analysis Results of This Use Case

Thank you for providing your use case! Apologies for the form letter, but it's a pleasure to see y'all :)

With technical knowledge work such as this project, it is important to structure information as well as possible, so that it can be processed automatically.

We also want to validate our inputs ;-)

So, this report contains the results of an automated analysis of the provided use case, looking for consistency with the documented format as covered in Section 3 "Case Study Structure" of the Style Guide.

Disclaimers:

• David Wheeler may provide guidance on how to handle these reports. We're grateful that you've put in this work already, and we don't want to burden you unnecessarily 'cuz you're probably busy :)
• Our style guide was not always 100% clear (as often happens early in technical knowledge work), so this analysis attempts to automatically resolve potential inconsistencies.
• This report is provided as a convenience. There may be some errors or omissions in this report.
• We will conduct deeper analysis at a later time.

Items are prioritized from Informative, Low, Medium, to High in terms of current importance to the project.

Analyzing Presence of Markdown

• [High] does not appear to have any markdown in it (no #, at least)

Parser Issues

The following issues were encountered by the parser used to analyze this file. This might explain potential errors and false positives in the subsequent analysis.

• [Info] Guessing that line 11 contains a new section 'Introduction'
• [Info] Guessing that line 17 contains a new section 'Software'
• [Info] Guessing that line 24 contains a new section 'Weakness'
• [Info] Guessing that line 31 contains a new section 'Vulnerability'
• [Info] Guessing that line 45 contains a new section 'Exploit'
• [Info] Guessing that line 50 contains a new section 'Fix'
• [Info] Guessing that line 58 contains a new section 'Prevention'
• [Info] Guessing that line 97 contains a new section 'Conclusion'
• [Info] Guessing that line 102 contains a new section 'References'
• [Info] Guessing that line 109 contains a new section 'Contributions'

Section Analysis

• [High] Expected section name missing: 'Title'
  • Important: detailed analysis not performed for this missing section
• [High] 1 major section-name issues detected.
• [Med] Section 'Introduction' is expected to have 3 hash marks, but it has 0
• [Med] Section 'Software' is expected to have 3 hash marks, but it has 0
• [Med] Section 'Weakness' is expected to have 3 hash marks, but it has 0
• [Med] Section 'Vulnerability' is expected to have 3 hash marks, but it has 0
• [Med] Section 'Exploit' is expected to have 3 hash marks, but it has 0
• [Med] Section 'Fix' is expected to have 3 hash marks, but it has 0
• [Med] Section 'Prevention' is expected to have 3 hash marks, but it has 0
• [Med] Section 'Conclusion' is expected to have 3 hash marks, but it has 0
• [Med] Section 'References' is expected to have 3 hash marks, but it has 0
• [Med] Section 'Contributions' is expected to have 3 hash marks, but it has 0

Analyzing Introduction Section

No issues found.

Analyzing Software Section

• [High] Missing **Name:** in Software section
• [High] Missing **Language:** in Software section
• [High] Missing **URL:** in Software section

Analyzing Weakness Section

No issues found.

Analyzing Vulnerability Section

• [High] Vulnerability section does not appear to contain a CVE-YYYY-NNNN
• [Med] Vulnerability section does not appear to contain a 'vulnerable file:' label
• [Med] No apparent source code ``` tags in Vulnerability section

Analyzing Fix Section

• [Med] Fix section does not appear to contain a 'fixed file:' label
• [Med] No apparent source code ``` tags in Fix section

Analyzing References Section

No issues found.