Command Injection via Unsanitized User Input (CVE-2019-1821)

case-study-CVE-2019-1821.md

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+# Command Injection via Unsanitized User Input (CVE-2019-1821)
+
+## Introduction
+As a part of the case study, I am researching this problem as it demonstrates how simple a seemingly innocent administrative option might become when an extra semicolon `;` is inserted. Cisco Prime Infrastructure and Cisco Evolved Programmable Network Manager (EPNM) are the products of choice when it comes to managing all types of network equipment, like routers, switches, access points, etc., of large organizations. They operate under the radar as root, and thus the flaw in the web UI might be disastrous.  
+
+CVE-2019-1821 is a typical command and injection vulnerability. The bug consists of directly dragging out a filename of a user into a shell command and performing no kind of sanitization. The result? An authorized user can hand anyone available surface shell code with root into a `;` and handle it like any other. Diversionary Operation is a great illustration of how you can ruin yourself by believing unverified information.  
+
+This write up offers a detailed walkthrough of how the genesis of the flaw, why it is significant, and what software engineering practices would have prevented its occurrence.
+
+## Software
+Some things are conveniently organized in the admin portal, like upload config files, run diagnostic scripts, and have a clean inventory. Behind the scenes the system gives birth to a cartoon load full of Linux style shell utilities to negotiate the files, digester information and job queues.  
+
+The heavy lifting currently is performed by the:  
+* Shell scripts which are directly off the Java (or whichever) server.  
+* Internal tools that receive filter names and path information as delegated by the user.  
+Significantly, a processing pipeline pipes one command to a second command until the task is accomplished.  
+
+When you provide the shell a string controlled by the user, you are more or less trusting the user. Failure to validate the string means giving them a backdoor and that was the last thing Cisco should have done. This is exactly what happened in CVE-2019-1821.
+
+## Weakness
+The problem is correlated with the following two types of weaknesses of MITRE:  
+
+**CWE-78**: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Found in an OS Command where user input is being incorporated in a command string without first screening off shell metacharacters such as `&&`, `;`, `|`, backticks and `,`. The shell perceives them with great delight, and can make a deadly attack out of an otherwise innocent file name.  
+
+**CWE-20**: “Improper Input validation which never verified the format of the file name or parameter name. It enabled any string to be entered, essentially, leading to the malfunction of the next command call.  
+
+CVE-2019-1821 is an example of two issues: the application accepted untrusted data to be trusted and allowed it to fall into command syntax.  
+
+
+## Vulnerability
+The real situation was that the backend was constructed to execute commands such as the following:
+
+```process_file <filename>```
+
+Given that the input in the file was raw user input, an attacker can create it in the form of
+
+```backup.txt; cat /etc/passwd;```
+
+The semicolon is the end of the first command and the shell executes the second command. The payload was given full privileges since the program invoked to carry out the command was a **root**.  
+
+Although the endpoint had to be authenticated, it was **not** required to have any administration account, which means that a low privileged user or a stolen account was able to cause the exploit. This design flaw caused a routine file upload feature into a critical attack vector.
+
+## Exploit
+This is how a typical chain looks like: 
+1. **An attacker authenticates with a low privilege account.**  
+2. **The attacker uploads a malicious filename or file containing shell metacharacters.**  
+3. **The backend joins with this and constructs a system command using the filename.**  
+4. **The shell executes the injected syntax with root privileges.**  
+
+An attacker will be able with that access to:  
+
+* Switch network configurations or reboot switches.  
+* Tamper with logs.  
+* Create new admin accounts. 
+* Install backdoors which do not move away.  
+* Traverse the whole corporate environment. 
+
+These systems lie at the center of enterprise infra hence the stakes are enormous.  
+
+## Fix  
+Cisco released patches which addressed the fundamental issues:  
+
+* Filename and parameter validation and sanitization are very strict.  
+* Use of unsafe string concatenation was substituted by safe and parameterized API calls.  
+* Used root where necessary and not mandatory where not necessary.  
+* Solidified the workflow process to ensure that it can only be activated by the privileged person.  
+* Second addition of extra tests in the pipeline to malicious patterns.  
+
+They also recommended that customers should patch immediately and restrict access to the file-upload feature.  
+
+## Prevention
+CVE-2019-1821 highlights several systemic lessons for secure software engineering:
+
+**1. Avoid constructing shell commands with user input**
+Use APIs that do not invoke shell parsing, such as parameterized `exec` functions.
+
+**2. Enforce strict input validation**
+Adopt allowlists rather than relying on blacklists.
+
+ **3. Apply least privilege**
+Backend components should never run as root unless required.
+
+**4. Review and audit all OS interfacing code**
+Any code path that constructs commands must undergo explicit security review.
+
+**5. Use strong isolation**
+Isolate file processing logic from privileged operations to reduce blast radius.
+
+**6. Treat all user input as untrusted**
+Even low privilege authenticated users may exploit injection flaws.
+
+## Conclusion
+CVE-2019-1821 teaches us the value of one bad input in the user land having the power to elevate a system to root. But Cisco Prime Infrastructure and EPNM exposed attackers to root level command execution. Since these systems manage enterprise wide networks, exploiting this flaw could threaten the stability and security of entire infrastructures.
+
+This case emphasizes foundational secure coding principles: validate all input, avoid shell-based command construction, operate with least privilege, and isolate sensitive operations. Learning from real world cases like this helps developers build safer, more resilient software systems. It is a good first aid course in secure coding that is not forgotten easily.  
+
+## References
+- Cisco Security Advisory for CVE-2019-1821  
+- National Vulnerability Database – https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-1821  
+- MITRE CWE-78 – https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html  
+- MITRE CWE-20 – https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html  
+- OWASP – Command Injection  
+- PortSwigger – OS Command Injection  
+
+## Contributions
+This created case study is written by **Sampreeth Mysore Prabhu Shankar** as part of a secure coding course project.  
+I confirm that this work is released under the **Creative Commons CC-BY-4.0** license for use in MITRE’s Secure Coding Case Studies repository.
+
+GitHub Issue: https://github.com/mitre/secure-coding-case-studies/issues/15