Conversation
martin-velay
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have added some comments, but I am still not done, I'll do another batch later. There are still some coding style issues
| @@ -0,0 +1,306 @@ | |||
| // This AXI4 VIP shall be always UVM_PASSIVE on top level | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The copyright header is missing
| typedef enum bit[2:0] { | ||
| mst0 = 0, | ||
| slv0 = 1, | ||
| slv1 = 2, | ||
| slv2 = 3, | ||
| slv3 = 4 | ||
| } axi_if_t; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would it be possible to change the field names into something more explicit like that maybe:
| typedef enum bit[2:0] { | |
| mst0 = 0, | |
| slv0 = 1, | |
| slv1 = 2, | |
| slv2 = 3, | |
| slv3 = 4 | |
| } axi_if_t; | |
| typedef enum bit[2:0] { | |
| mst0_cva6 = 0, | |
| slv0_sram = 1, | |
| slv1_mailbox = 2, | |
| slv2_tl_xbar = 3, | |
| slv3_dram = 4 | |
| } axi_if_t; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
top_pkg field names are used.
| // AXI VIP configuration | ||
| axi_cfg = new[NUM_OF_AXI_IFS]; | ||
| env.cfg.m_axi_cfg = new[NUM_OF_AXI_IFS]; | ||
| foreach(axi_cfg[i]) begin |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nit: you need a space here and same below for the case. Can you please check else where in your code that you follow this rule.
https://github.com/lowRISC/style-guides/blob/master/VerilogCodingStyle.md#space-around-keywords
|
|
||
| foreach (actual_q[s]) foreach (actual_q[s][i]) if (actual_q[s][i].size() > 0) | ||
| `uvm_error("SCB_DRAIN", $sformatf("Slave trans on %s (ID %h) never reached Master", s, i)) | ||
| endfunction : check_phase No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You need to configure your editor to make sure you insert an empty line at the end of each file (it's also part of the coding rules somewhere)
| string slave_name; | ||
| bit [63:0] start_addr; | ||
| bit [63:0] end_addr; | ||
| } local_addr_range_t; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you move this typedef into the env_pkg
| int unsigned master_id_width = 4; | ||
|
|
||
| // Analysis Implementation Ports | ||
| `uvm_analysis_imp_decl(_mst0) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the names if we can make it clearer which block is connected, as commented in the env_pkg, that would be better for debug purposes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Updated using the top_pkg names
|
|
||
| // Queues to handle out-of-order monitor arrivals | ||
| // [SlaveName][MaskedID] | ||
| axi4_vip_item expect_q[string][bit[63:0]][$]; // Master arrived first |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this 64 bits width linked with top_pkg::AxiDataWidth? It's better to point to a pkg value, this should be applied wherever required in this PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is ID width to handle when the interconnect extends the ID width to be able to back-route the transactions to the managers. However, good spot, the scoreboard cuts the unnecessary bits before anything is pushed to this queue. Replaced by parameter.
| mem_map.push_back('{"slv0", 64'h1000_0000, 64'h1001_FFFF}); | ||
| mem_map.push_back('{"slv1", 64'h2001_0000, 64'h2001_FFFF}); | ||
| mem_map.push_back('{"slv2", 64'h4000_0000, 64'h4FFF_FFFF}); | ||
| mem_map.push_back('{"slv3", 64'h8000_0000, 64'hBF7F_FFFF}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Here, the same applies, could you point at the pkg values please axi_addr_start_t
|
|
||
| function string top_chip_dv_axi_scoreboard::decode_addr(bit [63:0] addr); | ||
| foreach (mem_map[i]) begin | ||
| if (addr >= mem_map[i].start_addr && addr <= mem_map[i].end_addr) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You need to add the begin...end for each if whenever it doesn't fit on a single line as a rule. But as we talk about DV here, I'd prefer to add the begin...end and always jump a line this will facilitate breakpoint debug
|
|
||
| function void top_chip_dv_axi_scoreboard::check_phase(uvm_phase phase); | ||
| super.check_phase(phase); | ||
| foreach (expect_q[s]) foreach (expect_q[s][i]) if (expect_q[s][i].size() > 0) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This should be break down into multi lines and I think one foreach is useless:
| foreach (expect_q[s]) foreach (expect_q[s][i]) if (expect_q[s][i].size() > 0) | |
| foreach (expect_q[s][i]) begin | |
| if (expect_q[s][i].size() > 0) begin | |
| `uvm_error("SCB_DRAIN", $sformatf("Master req for %s (ID %h) never reached Slave", s, i)) | |
| end |
| // maximum supported bus widths | ||
| `define AXI4_MAX_ID_WIDTH 16 | ||
| `define AXI4_MAX_ADDR_WIDTH 64 | ||
| `define AXI4_MAX_DATA_WIDTH 512 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is there a reason why DATA_WIDTH 1024 is not supported?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Updated to 1024.
| if (current_burst == null) current_burst = axi4_vip_item::type_id::create("w_burst"); | ||
|
|
||
| current_burst.dir = AXI_WRITE; | ||
| current_burst.wdata.push_back(vif.monitor_cb.wdata & ((64'h1 << m_cfg.m_data_width) - 1)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't this be 512'h1 (or 1024'h1) for all rdata and wdata types?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Updated with the given define.
|
|
||
| // Local Address Map Struct | ||
| typedef struct { | ||
| string slave_name; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nit: the new nomenclature of AXI uses manager and subordinate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, we talked about this. Is it better if the naming matches the AXI standard or the current RTL. I know, the new standard uses manager and subordinate, but the RTL uses master and slave.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good point. I'd say that we should follow the latest nomenclature with manager/subordinate. So it might be that the RTL needs to be changed? But from our concern in this VIP, as its purpose goes beyond this particular DUT eventually, I'd suggest to use the new wording. Do you think there will be some confusing piece of code where the 2 kinds will live together?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Updated names.
| begin | ||
| bit [63:0] addr = (tr.dir == AXI_WRITE) ? tr.awaddr : tr.araddr; | ||
| bit [63:0] id = (tr.dir == AXI_WRITE) ? tr.awid : tr.arid; | ||
| // Note: resp logic simplified here for example; normally bit-sliced per beat |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you please formulate this comment more precise?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a legacy comment from a previous version. Thanks for spotting it. Removed.
Signed-off-by: Csaba Kiss <csaba.kiss@semify-eda.com>
Signed-off-by: Csaba Kiss <csaba.kiss@semify-eda.com>
…top UVM environment Signed-off-by: Csaba Kiss <csaba.kiss@semify-eda.com>
f698608 to
78b7a22
Compare
Tested with top level test cases.