Skip to content

Conversation

@HappyBasher
Copy link
Member

Description

Implements compatibility for Debian 13 Trixie

Type of change

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

How Has This Been Tested?

Domain join and domain logon after Linbo imaging with different clients has been successfully tested with Debian 13 and Ubuntu 24.04.

@dorianim
Copy link
Member

Is this backwards compatible with older os versions?

@HappyBasher
Copy link
Member Author

Not tested yet. The package will be placed in lmn73-testing repo to allow community tests.

@dorianim
Copy link
Member

dorianim commented Oct 29, 2025

Ok.
To be honest, I don't understand most of the changes you made and I cannot assess which effects they will have.
Therefore, I cannot properly review this PR at the moment.

So we have two options:

  • I ask some more questions and you explain why the changes are necessary (what issues they fix) and what effects they have. We will only merge once I understand all of the changes.
  • We just merge and you will be solely responsible for maintaining these changes and supporting user issues related to them in the future

What do you prefer?

@HappyBasher
Copy link
Member Author

Above modifications are an approach to implement Debian 13 support, which is not given with v1.0.11. Without krb5 pam authentication there is no persistence of the domain membership when transfering an Linbo image to another client.
Configuration is done according to this guide: https://wiki.debian.org/AuthenticatingLinuxWithActiveDirectorySssd
I think option 2 is the best choice.

@dorianim
Copy link
Member

Alright, then you are now responsible for all krb/sssd-configuration related issues :)

@dorianim dorianim merged commit ebabcfc into master Oct 30, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@dorianim dorianim deleted the trixie branch October 30, 2025 13:31
@HappyBasher
Copy link
Member Author

Oops, it's merged into master. I didn't meant to do that, cause this is testing and buggy it should be in it's own branch trixie. I'll revert #81 and will see how I can manage that.

@HappyBasher HappyBasher mentioned this pull request Nov 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants