Open
Conversation
🤖 Kimi Code ReviewThis is a documentation-only PR that summarizes API design alternatives. As such, there's no code to review for correctness, safety, or performance issues. The document is well-structured and provides a comprehensive comparison of the different approaches. The examples are clear and the trade-offs are well-explained. One minor suggestion: The "Status" column in the comparison matrix shows Approach B as "WIP" but the document states it's "Fully implemented" - this should be updated for consistency. Automated review by Kimi (Moonshot AI) · custom prompt |
🤖 Codex Code ReviewI checked the diff: it only adds If you want doc feedback, I can do a content/clarity pass with line references, but there’s no code-level review to perform here. Automated review by OpenAI Codex · custom prompt |
Contributor
Greptile SummaryAdds comprehensive API alternatives comparison document for the actor framework redesign. The document compares 6 different approaches (A-F) with the same chat room example, including full code samples, analysis tables, and trade-off discussions. All branch references have been verified and point to the correct branches ( Key sections:
Confidence Score: 5/5
|
| Filename | Overview |
|---|---|
| docs/API_ALTERNATIVES_SUMMARY.md | New comprehensive API comparison document with 6 approaches, code examples, and analysis tables - well-structured and informative |
Last reviewed commit: 7a92097
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Comment on lines
5
to
20
| ## Table of Contents | ||
|
|
||
| - [The Two Problems](#the-two-problems) | ||
| - [The Chat Room Example](#the-chat-room-example) | ||
| - [Baseline: The Old API](#baseline-the-old-api-whats-on-main-today) | ||
| - [Approach A: Handler\<M\> + Recipient\<M\>](#approach-a-handlerm--recipientm-actix-style) | ||
| - [Approach B: Protocol Traits](#approach-b-protocol-traits-user-defined-contracts) | ||
| - [Approach C: Typed Wrappers](#approach-c-typed-wrappers-non-breaking) | ||
| - [Approach D: Derive Macro](#approach-d-derive-macro) | ||
| - [Approach E: AnyActorRef](#approach-e-anyactorref-fully-type-erased) | ||
| - [Approach F: PID Addressing](#approach-f-pid-addressing-erlang-style) | ||
| - [Registry & Service Discovery](#registry--service-discovery) | ||
| - [Macro Improvement Potential](#macro-improvement-potential) | ||
| - [Comparison Matrix](#comparison-matrix) | ||
| - [Recommendation](#recommendation) | ||
| - [Branch Reference](#branch-reference) |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Table of Contents is missing Detailed Design Documents section that exists at line 1198
Suggested change
| ## Table of Contents | |
| - [The Two Problems](#the-two-problems) | |
| - [The Chat Room Example](#the-chat-room-example) | |
| - [Baseline: The Old API](#baseline-the-old-api-whats-on-main-today) | |
| - [Approach A: Handler\<M\> + Recipient\<M\>](#approach-a-handlerm--recipientm-actix-style) | |
| - [Approach B: Protocol Traits](#approach-b-protocol-traits-user-defined-contracts) | |
| - [Approach C: Typed Wrappers](#approach-c-typed-wrappers-non-breaking) | |
| - [Approach D: Derive Macro](#approach-d-derive-macro) | |
| - [Approach E: AnyActorRef](#approach-e-anyactorref-fully-type-erased) | |
| - [Approach F: PID Addressing](#approach-f-pid-addressing-erlang-style) | |
| - [Registry & Service Discovery](#registry--service-discovery) | |
| - [Macro Improvement Potential](#macro-improvement-potential) | |
| - [Comparison Matrix](#comparison-matrix) | |
| - [Recommendation](#recommendation) | |
| - [Branch Reference](#branch-reference) | |
| - [The Two Problems](#the-two-problems) | |
| - [The Chat Room Example](#the-chat-room-example) | |
| - [Baseline: The Old API](#baseline-the-old-api-whats-on-main-today) | |
| - [Approach A: Handler\<M\> + Recipient\<M\>](#approach-a-handlerm--recipientm-actix-style) | |
| - [Approach B: Protocol Traits](#approach-b-protocol-traits-user-defined-contracts) | |
| - [Approach C: Typed Wrappers](#approach-c-typed-wrappers-non-breaking) | |
| - [Approach D: Derive Macro](#approach-d-derive-macro) | |
| - [Approach E: AnyActorRef](#approach-e-anyactorref-fully-type-erased) | |
| - [Approach F: PID Addressing](#approach-f-pid-addressing-erlang-style) | |
| - [Registry & Service Discovery](#registry--service-discovery) | |
| - [Macro Improvement Potential](#macro-improvement-potential) | |
| - [Comparison Matrix](#comparison-matrix) | |
| - [Recommendation](#recommendation) | |
| - [Branch Reference](#branch-reference) | |
| - [Detailed Design Documents](#detailed-design-documents) |
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: docs/API_ALTERNATIVES_SUMMARY.md
Line: 5-20
Comment:
Table of Contents is missing `Detailed Design Documents` section that exists at line 1198
```suggestion
- [The Two Problems](#the-two-problems)
- [The Chat Room Example](#the-chat-room-example)
- [Baseline: The Old API](#baseline-the-old-api-whats-on-main-today)
- [Approach A: Handler\<M\> + Recipient\<M\>](#approach-a-handlerm--recipientm-actix-style)
- [Approach B: Protocol Traits](#approach-b-protocol-traits-user-defined-contracts)
- [Approach C: Typed Wrappers](#approach-c-typed-wrappers-non-breaking)
- [Approach D: Derive Macro](#approach-d-derive-macro)
- [Approach E: AnyActorRef](#approach-e-anyactorref-fully-type-erased)
- [Approach F: PID Addressing](#approach-f-pid-addressing-erlang-style)
- [Registry & Service Discovery](#registry--service-discovery)
- [Macro Improvement Potential](#macro-improvement-potential)
- [Comparison Matrix](#comparison-matrix)
- [Recommendation](#recommendation)
- [Branch Reference](#branch-reference)
- [Detailed Design Documents](#detailed-design-documents)
```
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
docs/API_ALTERNATIVES_SUMMARY.md— comprehensive comparison of 6 API approaches (A–F) for the actor frameworkfeat/approach-aandfeat/approach-bTest plan