-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Introduce fakes and contract tests for AWS Lambda integration #763
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
tooky
wants to merge
10
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
introduce-lambda-fakes-and-contracts
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7416da8
refactor: extract LambdaAPI interface from concrete *lambda.Client
tooky c9f7033
test: add LambdaAPI contract test suite against real AWS
tooky 9b89259
feat: add FakeLambdaClient that passes the LambdaAPI contract
tooky d3f7fa2
test: add fake-backed unit tests for Lambda filtering and pagination
tooky 4e9789f
test: add fake-backed unit tests for Lambda orchestration
tooky 0c87bc5
test: trim Lambda integration tests to focused smoke tests
tooky cb9aa68
chore: mark all Lambda fakes & contract slices complete in TODO
tooky ef346fe
feat: inject FakeLambdaClient into command tests via factory
tooky 6b2462e
chore: mark Slice 7 complete in TODO
tooky f8b2aa0
docs: add TODO checklist for remaining cloud provider fakes
tooky File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Observation (non-blocking): Package-level mutable globals for test injection are pragmatic here but worth noting: if
internal/awstests ever run witht.Parallel()at the package level, concurrent writes toNewLambdaClientFuncwould race. Currently safe becausego testserialises tests within a package by default, and theTearDownTestinsnapshotLambda_test.goproperly resets it. Just something to keep in mind as more providers adopt this pattern.