feat: add github_enterprise_actions_hosted_runner

[nico34638]

Resolves #3016

---

Before the change?

• No possibility to create hosted runner at enterprise level

After the change?

• It's possible

Pull request checklist

• Schema migrations have been created if needed (example)
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been reviewed and added / updated if needed (for bug fixes / features)

Does this introduce a breaking change?

Please see our docs on breaking changes to help!

• Yes
• No

---

[github-actions]

👋 Hi! Thank you for this contribution! Just to let you know, our GitHub SDK team does a round of issue and PR reviews twice a week, every Monday and Friday! We have a process in place for prioritizing and responding to your input. Because you are a part of this community please feel free to comment, add to, or pick up any issues/PRs that are labeled with Status: Up for grabs. You & others like you are the reason all of this works! So thank you & happy coding! 🚀

[deiga]

Hey @nico34638 👋

Thank you very much for your contribution! We're currently working on a major release of the provider and that will possibly delay getting this PR merged.

While that's happening, could I bother you for a few changes?

• We're moving towards using Context-aware provider functions (ReadContext, CreateContext, etc.). Could you refactor your PR to use those? :)
• Another major upcoming change will be generating docs based on Schema contents. Could you ensure that all levels of the Schema have Description fields which contain all necessary information for the docs?

Support for Hosted runners for enterprises was added in v70 of go-github. Our upcoming major release will upgrade to v77. Could you rebase your branch on top of #2891 and use the SDK methods instead of manual HTTP requests? :)

[nico34638]

Okay, I made the changes you requested. I rebased on your branch with go github/v77 and changed the description fields. Is that okay with you? I tested it, and with the changes, it still works.

[deiga]

Hey @nico34638
Could you rebase your PR onto main now, we've upgraded the go-github version? 🙏

[nico34638]

Hey @deiga, It's done. Do you have any idea when the provider's next release will be?

[deiga]

Please ensure the test structure follows the current pattern

[nico34638]

I have corrected the comments

[nico34638]

Hi @deiga do you any news ?

[stevehipwell]

Thanks for the PR @nico34638, I've added some initial review comments.

[nico34638]

Following the last review, I'm taking this opportunity to add two data sources for hosted enterprise runners:
one to list them and one to get the details.

[nico34638]

Hi @stevehipwell @deiga Do you have any news ?

[deiga]

Please ensure to propagate comments to other places where they would be applicable

[deiga]

Please read through your own code and see to it that it's consistent with itself.

I don't know if you use an LLM to generate code or are just in a hurry, but please don't make us comment multiple times on the same issues ☺️

[nico34638]

Thanks for the feedback. I apologize for the inconsistencies.

I am really trying my best to keep this PR clean, but it is not that simple. Reviews are spaced about many weeks apart. It is hard to keep track of comments made two months ago.

The requirements also keep changing mid-flight. For example, we now need datasources in addition to resources to get merged. On top of that, the codebase is being refactored.

I have reviewed the code again and updated a few more details on my end. However, I would really appreciate more specific information on what exactly still needs to change