Update survey roadmap: mark 10b shipped, add 10e simulation details#275
Update survey roadmap: mark 10b shipped, add 10e simulation details#275
Conversation
- Mark Phase 10b (research-grade DGP) as shipped with parameter summary - Add conditional PT as required DGP extension for position paper (10e) simulation study — unconditional PT fails, conditional PT holds after covariate adjustment, DR/IPW recovers truth - Genericize co-authorship suggestion (no specific names) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Overall Assessment ✅ Looks good Executive Summary
Methodology No findings. Methods affected: none; this PR updates roadmap text only. The new 10b status is consistent with the implemented DGP parameters and behavior in diff_diff/prep_dgp.py#L1184, diff_diff/prep_dgp.py#L1258, and diff_diff/prep_dgp.py#L1670, plus existing tests in tests/test_prep.py#L1559, tests/test_prep.py#L1589, tests/test_prep.py#L1759, and tests/test_prep.py#L1792. The registry already documents the The new 10e language also stays within documented methodology boundaries: it marks Code Quality No findings. Markdown-only edits; no new code paths or anti-patterns were introduced. Performance No findings. No runtime code changed. Maintainability No findings. The updated roadmap text is aligned with current implementation and existing methodology notes rather than creating a competing description. Tech Debt No findings. The only unresolved item introduced by the text is the future Security No findings. No executable code, dependencies, secrets, or data-handling logic changed. Documentation/Tests No findings. No new tests are required for this docs-only PR, and the substantive roadmap assertions are already backed by existing DGP tests in tests/test_prep.py#L1512. Residual risk is limited to ordinary documentation drift because roadmap pages are manually maintained. |
Summary
Methodology references
Validation
Security / privacy
Generated with Claude Code