Conversation
Add AI manifest, Trustfile, Dustfile, and assail recipe as part of the Floor Raise campaign to establish baseline tooling across all repos. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Standard RSR documentation: quotes README claims, lists tech choices with links, honest caveats, dogfooding table. See rsr-template-repo for the pattern. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…useless, commands) Batch Justfile audit: standardised naming (lowercase→Justfile), fixed parse errors, removed useless build-riscv from non-Rust repos, added missing assail recipe, and fixed code quality issues. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 19b0f42eb5
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| # Find any uses: lines that don't have @SHA format | ||
| # Pattern: uses: owner/repo@<40-char-hex> | ||
| unpinned=$(grep -rn "uses:" .github/workflows/ | \ | ||
| unpinned=$(grep -rnE "^[[:space:]]+uses:" .github/workflows/ | \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- uses: syntax in SHA-pinning scan
The updated pattern ^[[:space:]]+uses: in the Check SHA-Pinned Actions step no longer matches shorthand step declarations like - uses: ..., which are valid and already used in this repository (for example in ts-blocker.yml and scorecard-enforcer.yml). As a result, unpinned actions introduced with shorthand syntax will bypass this linter and the workflow can report a false pass on pinning compliance.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
No description provided.