docs: fix spelling error in response_for_auth_required parameter docstring

[dunnkers]

No description provided.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @dunnkers, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a minor but important documentation improvement by fixing a spelling error. The change corrects a typo in the docstring for the response_for_auth_required parameter, ensuring accuracy and clarity in the code's explanation of authentication configuration.

Highlights

• Documentation Fix: Corrected a spelling error from "secrect" to "secret" within the docstring for the response_for_auth_required parameter. This change was applied consistently across two files.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a spelling error ('secrect' to 'secret') and a punctuation issue in the docstrings of AuthenticatedFunctionTool and BaseAuthenticatedTool. Your changes improve the clarity of the documentation. I've added a couple of suggestions to also correct a minor grammatical issue on the same lines for further improvement.

[jsoref]

• fwiw chore: Fix spelling #2447 had the basic spelling correction of secret, but that PR has been ignored by the designated reviewer.

[adk-bot]

Thank you @dunnkers for your contribution! 🎉

Your changes have been successfully imported and merged via Copybara in commit 44aa821.

Closing this PR as the changes are now in the main branch.