Rust: Add type inference test cases for tuples. #20004
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
geoffw0
added
no-change-note-required
hvitved
previously approved these changes
Jul 9, 2025
Contributor
hvitved
left a comment
hvitved
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just double checking: Did you run rustfmt --edition 2024 main.rs?
Contributor
Author
|
Just done. |
hvitved
previously approved these changes
Jul 9, 2025
Contributor
|
FYI: I also created a similar PR #20003 . Currently type inference does not work for pattern matches (including tuples). |
hvitved
approved these changes
Jul 10, 2025
Contributor
Author
Seems like they're different enough we should have both. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add type inference test cases for tuples. We worked around this in https://github.com/github/codeql/pull/19946/files#r2192987950 . @hvitved FYI.