Rust: extract types #18000
Closed
Rust: extract types #18000
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
aibaars
commented
Nov 15, 2024
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| not exists(super.getType()) and | ||
| ( | ||
| result = this.getMacroCall().getExpanded().(Expr).getType() or | ||
| result = typeOf(this.getMacroCall().getExpanded().(MacroStmts)) |
Check warning
Code scanning / CodeQL
Redundant cast Warning
aibaars
force-pushed
the
aibaars/rust-types
branch
3 times, most recently
from
843eaca to
ab58086
Compare
aibaars
force-pushed
the
aibaars/rust-types
branch
from
ab58086 to
9eac54f
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request changes the extractor to emit types for
ExprandPatnodes. Currently thegetType()method returns a simple string representing the unqualified type.As a follow up we should improve the way types are represented. Types should at least have qualifiers, and most likely a more structured representation would be better.