Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
{
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"id": "GHSA-cv4x-93xx-wgfj",
"modified": "2026-03-17T19:46:29Z",
"modified": "2026-03-17T19:46:30Z",
"published": "2026-03-17T19:46:29Z",
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33022"
],
"summary": "Tekton Pipelines controller panic via long resolver name in TaskRun/PipelineRun",
"details": "### Summary\n\nA user with permission to create or update a TaskRun or PipelineRun can crash the Tekton Pipelines controller by setting `.spec.taskRef.resolver` (or `.spec.pipelineRef.resolver`) to a string of 31 characters or more, causing a denial of service for all reconciliation.\n\n### Details\n\nThe controller panics in `GenerateDeterministicNameFromSpec` when building a deterministic `ResolutionRequest` name. The generated name has the format `{resolver}-{hash}` and, when the resolver name is long enough, the result exceeds the DNS-1123 label limit of 63 characters.\n\nThe truncation logic attempts to find a word boundary using `strings.LastIndex(name, \" \")`. Since the generated name never contains spaces (it is composed of the resolver name, a dash, and a hex-encoded hash), `LastIndex` returns `-1`, which is then used as a slice bound:\n\n```go\nreturn name[:strings.LastIndex(name[:maxLength], \" \")], nil\n// strings.LastIndex returns -1 → panic: slice bounds out of range [:-1]\n```\n\nThe panic crashes the controller. Because the offending TaskRun or PipelineRun is re-reconciled on restart, the controller enters a `CrashLoopBackOff`, blocking all TaskRun and PipelineRun reconciliation cluster-wide until the offending resource is manually deleted.\n\nBuilt-in resolvers use short names (`git`, `cluster`, `bundles`, `hub`) and are not affected under normal usage. The vulnerability is exploitable by any user who can create TaskRuns or PipelineRuns with a custom resolver name.\n\n### Impact\n\n**Denial of service** — A single malicious TaskRun or PipelineRun with a long resolver name is sufficient to crash the Tekton Pipelines controller into a restart loop, blocking all CI/CD reconciliation cluster-wide until the resource is removed.\n\n### Patches\n\n_(to be filled in: e.g. \"Fixed in versions 1.10.1, 1.9.1, ...\")_\n\nThe fix computes the hash first, then truncates only the prefix (resolver name) to fit within the DNS-1123 label limit, preserving the full hash to maintain determinism and uniqueness of `ResolutionRequest` names.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nRestrict who can create TaskRun and PipelineRun resources via Kubernetes RBAC. There is no validation-side workaround without patching.\n\n### Affected Versions\n\nAll releases from **v0.60.0** through **v1.10.0**.\n\nThe vulnerable truncation logic was introduced in commit `ea1fa7ad1fdc` (\"Remote Resolution Refactor\"), first released in v0.60.0 (2024-05-22).\n\nCurrently supported affected releases:\n- **v1.10.x** (latest)\n- **v1.9.x** (LTS, EOL 2027-01-30)\n- **v1.6.x** (LTS, EOL 2026-10-31)\n- **v1.3.x** (LTS, EOL 2026-08-04)\n- **v1.0.x** (LTS, EOL 2026-04-29)\n\nReleases prior to v0.60.0 are **not affected** — the truncation code did not exist.\n\n### Acknowledgments\n\nThis vulnerability was reported by Oleh Konko (@1seal), who provided a thorough vulnerability analysis, proof-of-concept, and review of the fix. Thank you!\n\n### References\n\n- Fix: _(link to merged PR/commit)_\n- Introduced in: `ea1fa7ad1fdc` (\"Remote Resolution Refactor\")",
"details": "### Summary\n\nA user with permission to create or update a TaskRun or PipelineRun can crash the Tekton Pipelines controller by setting `.spec.taskRef.resolver` (or `.spec.pipelineRef.resolver`) to a string of 31 characters or more, causing a denial of service for all reconciliation.\n\n### Details\n\nThe controller panics in `GenerateDeterministicNameFromSpec` when building a deterministic `ResolutionRequest` name. The generated name has the format `{resolver}-{hash}` and, when the resolver name is long enough, the result exceeds the DNS-1123 label limit of 63 characters.\n\nThe truncation logic attempts to find a word boundary using `strings.LastIndex(name, \" \")`. Since the generated name never contains spaces (it is composed of the resolver name, a dash, and a hex-encoded hash), `LastIndex` returns `-1`, which is then used as a slice bound:\n\n```go\nreturn name[:strings.LastIndex(name[:maxLength], \" \")], nil\n// strings.LastIndex returns -1 → panic: slice bounds out of range [:-1]\n```\n\nThe panic crashes the controller. Because the offending TaskRun or PipelineRun is re-reconciled on restart, the controller enters a `CrashLoopBackOff`, blocking all TaskRun and PipelineRun reconciliation cluster-wide until the offending resource is manually deleted.\n\nBuilt-in resolvers use short names (`git`, `cluster`, `bundles`, `hub`) and are not affected under normal usage. The vulnerability is exploitable by any user who can create TaskRuns or PipelineRuns with a custom resolver name.\n\n### Impact\n\n**Denial of service** — A single malicious TaskRun or PipelineRun with a long resolver name is sufficient to crash the Tekton Pipelines controller into a restart loop, blocking all CI/CD reconciliation cluster-wide until the resource is removed.\n\n### Patches\n\nFixed in versions 1.0.1, 1.3.3, 1.6.1, 1.9.2, 1.10.2.\n\nThe fix computes the hash first, then truncates only the prefix (resolver name) to fit within the DNS-1123 label limit, preserving the full hash to maintain determinism and uniqueness of `ResolutionRequest` names.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nRestrict who can create TaskRun and PipelineRun resources via Kubernetes RBAC. There is no validation-side workaround without patching.\n\n### Affected Versions\n\nAll releases from **v0.60.0** through **v1.10.0**.\n\nThe vulnerable truncation logic was introduced in commit `ea1fa7ad1fdc` (\"Remote Resolution Refactor\"), first released in v0.60.0 (2024-05-22).\n\nCurrently supported affected releases:\n- **v1.10.x** (latest)\n- **v1.9.x** (LTS, EOL 2027-01-30)\n- **v1.6.x** (LTS, EOL 2026-10-31)\n- **v1.3.x** (LTS, EOL 2026-08-04)\n- **v1.0.x** (LTS, EOL 2026-04-29)\n\nReleases prior to v0.60.0 are **not affected** — the truncation code did not exist.\n\n### Acknowledgments\n\nThis vulnerability was reported by Oleh Konko (@1seal), who provided a thorough vulnerability analysis, proof-of-concept, and review of the fix. Thank you!\n\n### References\n\n- Fix (main): [5eead3f859b9](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/commit/5eead3f859b9f938e86039e4d29185092c1d4ee6)\n- Fix (v1.10.x): [01673237c464](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/commit/01673237c464cfac7e286183f5c9e9d6ec951a64)\n- Fix (v1.9.x): [edc64bbf2232](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/commit/edc64bbf22323fcf218170f19047c9bcd8163e90)\n- Fix (v1.6.x): [0fa2d66cff81](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/commit/0fa2d66cff814838c3a10cce252104c7fe618932)\n- Fix (v1.3.x): [5e4905fb6754](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/commit/5e4905fb6754efa5ecea54de195738d73fb0e01d)\n- Fix (v1.0.x): [ebc197e2b973](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/commit/ebc197e2b9733deedaa1624212ec66dcdf61eaaf)\n- Introduced in: `ea1fa7ad1fdc` (\"Remote Resolution Refactor\")\n",
Copy link

Copilot AI Mar 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In details, fixed versions are listed without the v prefix, while the rest of the advisory uses v0.60.0, v1.10.0, etc. For consistency and to reduce ambiguity for readers, consider formatting these as v1.0.1, v1.3.3, etc.

Suggested change
"details": "### Summary\n\nA user with permission to create or update a TaskRun or PipelineRun can crash the Tekton Pipelines controller by setting `.spec.taskRef.resolver` (or `.spec.pipelineRef.resolver`) to a string of 31 characters or more, causing a denial of service for all reconciliation.\n\n### Details\n\nThe controller panics in `GenerateDeterministicNameFromSpec` when building a deterministic `ResolutionRequest` name. The generated name has the format `{resolver}-{hash}` and, when the resolver name is long enough, the result exceeds the DNS-1123 label limit of 63 characters.\n\nThe truncation logic attempts to find a word boundary using `strings.LastIndex(name, \" \")`. Since the generated name never contains spaces (it is composed of the resolver name, a dash, and a hex-encoded hash), `LastIndex` returns `-1`, which is then used as a slice bound:\n\n```go\nreturn name[:strings.LastIndex(name[:maxLength], \" \")], nil\n// strings.LastIndex returns -1 → panic: slice bounds out of range [:-1]\n```\n\nThe panic crashes the controller. Because the offending TaskRun or PipelineRun is re-reconciled on restart, the controller enters a `CrashLoopBackOff`, blocking all TaskRun and PipelineRun reconciliation cluster-wide until the offending resource is manually deleted.\n\nBuilt-in resolvers use short names (`git`, `cluster`, `bundles`, `hub`) and are not affected under normal usage. The vulnerability is exploitable by any user who can create TaskRuns or PipelineRuns with a custom resolver name.\n\n### Impact\n\n**Denial of service** — A single malicious TaskRun or PipelineRun with a long resolver name is sufficient to crash the Tekton Pipelines controller into a restart loop, blocking all CI/CD reconciliation cluster-wide until the resource is removed.\n\n### Patches\n\nFixed in versions 1.0.1, 1.3.3, 1.6.1, 1.9.2, 1.10.2.\n\nThe fix computes the hash first, then truncates only the prefix (resolver name) to fit within the DNS-1123 label limit, preserving the full hash to maintain determinism and uniqueness of `ResolutionRequest` names.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nRestrict who can create TaskRun and PipelineRun resources via Kubernetes RBAC. There is no validation-side workaround without patching.\n\n### Affected Versions\n\nAll releases from **v0.60.0** through **v1.10.0**.\n\nThe vulnerable truncation logic was introduced in commit `ea1fa7ad1fdc` (\"Remote Resolution Refactor\"), first released in v0.60.0 (2024-05-22).\n\nCurrently supported affected releases:\n- **v1.10.x** (latest)\n- **v1.9.x** (LTS, EOL 2027-01-30)\n- **v1.6.x** (LTS, EOL 2026-10-31)\n- **v1.3.x** (LTS, EOL 2026-08-04)\n- **v1.0.x** (LTS, EOL 2026-04-29)\n\nReleases prior to v0.60.0 are **not affected** — the truncation code did not exist.\n\n### Acknowledgments\n\nThis vulnerability was reported by Oleh Konko (@1seal), who provided a thorough vulnerability analysis, proof-of-concept, and review of the fix. Thank you!\n\n### References\n\n- Fix (main): [5eead3f859b9](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/commit/5eead3f859b9f938e86039e4d29185092c1d4ee6)\n- Fix (v1.10.x): [01673237c464](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/commit/01673237c464cfac7e286183f5c9e9d6ec951a64)\n- Fix (v1.9.x): [edc64bbf2232](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/commit/edc64bbf22323fcf218170f19047c9bcd8163e90)\n- Fix (v1.6.x): [0fa2d66cff81](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/commit/0fa2d66cff814838c3a10cce252104c7fe618932)\n- Fix (v1.3.x): [5e4905fb6754](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/commit/5e4905fb6754efa5ecea54de195738d73fb0e01d)\n- Fix (v1.0.x): [ebc197e2b973](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/commit/ebc197e2b9733deedaa1624212ec66dcdf61eaaf)\n- Introduced in: `ea1fa7ad1fdc` (\"Remote Resolution Refactor\")\n",
"details": "### Summary\n\nA user with permission to create or update a TaskRun or PipelineRun can crash the Tekton Pipelines controller by setting `.spec.taskRef.resolver` (or `.spec.pipelineRef.resolver`) to a string of 31 characters or more, causing a denial of service for all reconciliation.\n\n### Details\n\nThe controller panics in `GenerateDeterministicNameFromSpec` when building a deterministic `ResolutionRequest` name. The generated name has the format `{resolver}-{hash}` and, when the resolver name is long enough, the result exceeds the DNS-1123 label limit of 63 characters.\n\nThe truncation logic attempts to find a word boundary using `strings.LastIndex(name, \" \")`. Since the generated name never contains spaces (it is composed of the resolver name, a dash, and a hex-encoded hash), `LastIndex` returns `-1`, which is then used as a slice bound:\n\n```go\nreturn name[:strings.LastIndex(name[:maxLength], \" \")], nil\n// strings.LastIndex returns -1 → panic: slice bounds out of range [:-1]\n```\n\nThe panic crashes the controller. Because the offending TaskRun or PipelineRun is re-reconciled on restart, the controller enters a `CrashLoopBackOff`, blocking all TaskRun and PipelineRun reconciliation cluster-wide until the offending resource is manually deleted.\n\nBuilt-in resolvers use short names (`git`, `cluster`, `bundles`, `hub`) and are not affected under normal usage. The vulnerability is exploitable by any user who can create TaskRuns or PipelineRuns with a custom resolver name.\n\n### Impact\n\n**Denial of service** — A single malicious TaskRun or PipelineRun with a long resolver name is sufficient to crash the Tekton Pipelines controller into a restart loop, blocking all CI/CD reconciliation cluster-wide until the resource is removed.\n\n### Patches\n\nFixed in versions v1.0.1, v1.3.3, v1.6.1, v1.9.2, v1.10.2.\n\nThe fix computes the hash first, then truncates only the prefix (resolver name) to fit within the DNS-1123 label limit, preserving the full hash to maintain determinism and uniqueness of `ResolutionRequest` names.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nRestrict who can create TaskRun and PipelineRun resources via Kubernetes RBAC. There is no validation-side workaround without patching.\n\n### Affected Versions\n\nAll releases from **v0.60.0** through **v1.10.0**.\n\nThe vulnerable truncation logic was introduced in commit `ea1fa7ad1fdc` (\"Remote Resolution Refactor\"), first released in v0.60.0 (2024-05-22).\n\nCurrently supported affected releases:\n- **v1.10.x** (latest)\n- **v1.9.x** (LTS, EOL 2027-01-30)\n- **v1.6.x** (LTS, EOL 2026-10-31)\n- **v1.3.x** (LTS, EOL 2026-08-04)\n- **v1.0.x** (LTS, EOL 2026-04-29)\n\nReleases prior to v0.60.0 are **not affected** — the truncation code did not exist.\n\n### Acknowledgments\n\nThis vulnerability was reported by Oleh Konko (@1seal), who provided a thorough vulnerability analysis, proof-of-concept, and review of the fix. Thank you!\n\n### References\n\n- Fix (main): [5eead3f859b9](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/commit/5eead3f859b9f938e86039e4d29185092c1d4ee6)\n- Fix (v1.10.x): [01673237c464](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/commit/01673237c464cfac7e286183f5c9e9d6ec951a64)\n- Fix (v1.9.x): [edc64bbf2232](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/commit/edc64bbf22323fcf218170f19047c9bcd8163e90)\n- Fix (v1.6.x): [0fa2d66cff81](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/commit/0fa2d66cff814838c3a10cce252104c7fe618932)\n- Fix (v1.3.x): [5e4905fb6754](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/commit/5e4905fb6754efa5ecea54de195738d73fb0e01d)\n- Fix (v1.0.x): [ebc197e2b973](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/commit/ebc197e2b9733deedaa1624212ec66dcdf61eaaf)\n- Introduced in: `ea1fa7ad1fdc` (\"Remote Resolution Refactor\")\n",

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
"severity": [
{
"type": "CVSS_V3",
Expand All @@ -28,11 +28,14 @@
"introduced": "0.60.0"
},
{
"last_affected": "1.10.0"
"fixed": "1.0.1, 1.3.3, 1.6.1, 1.9.2, 1.10.2"
}
]
Comment on lines 28 to 33
Copy link

Copilot AI Mar 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This fixed event value is not a single version but a comma-separated list, which is incompatible with the OSV affected.ranges.events model (each fixed should be a single version). Additionally, using introduced: 0.60.0 with fixed: 1.0.1 implies versions >= 1.0.1 (like 1.10.0) are not affected, which contradicts the advisory’s stated affected range through 1.10.0. Represent the fix points as either (a) multiple ranges/events with single fixed versions that correctly model the affected set, or (b) keep last_affected semantics in ranges and move the multi-branch fixed versions list into an appropriate metadata field (e.g., ecosystem_specific/database_specific) and/or keep it in details only.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
}
]
],
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "<= 1.10.0"
}
Comment on lines +35 to +38
Copy link

Copilot AI Mar 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given the patch list includes fixes up to 1.10.2, this last_known_affected_version_range field is easy to misread as the authoritative machine-consumable constraint and may become inconsistent with the affected range model (especially if the fixed event is corrected). Consider either removing this field (if not used by your consumers) or updating it to a format/value that unambiguously matches the canonical affected-range modeling used elsewhere in this schema.

Suggested change
],
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "<= 1.10.0"
}
]

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
}
],
"references": [
Expand Down
Loading