feat(client): add TaskProducer#633
Merged
Merged
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 2 potential issues.
❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.
Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3c5d377. Configure here.
untitaker
approved these changes
May 13, 2026
3c5d377 to
2552017
Compare
This was referenced May 15, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

Ticket: https://linear.app/getsentry/issue/STREAM-950/create-the-taskproducer-abstraction-in-taskworker-client
This PR adds a
TaskProducerclass to the taskworker client. It works by taking an arroyo producer as argument, and when.produce()is called it tracks the producer future rather than returning it to the user.Previously we talked about allowing the TaskProducer to use any producer internally (not just an arroyo one), but taskbroker_client already depends on arroyo and it'd be hard to get the typing to work otherwise (since arroyo producers can return
SimpleProducerFuture, which needs to be handled differently from regularconcurrent.future.Future's).