Add GraphQL Apollo Kotlin 4 integration

[lcian]

📜 Description

Adds a new module to integrate Apollo Kotlin 4.

💡 Motivation and Context

Closes #3662

💚 How did you test it?

Unit tests with both ApolloCall<D>::execute and ApolloCall<D>::executeV3 (behaving as v3).

📝 Checklist

• I added tests to verify the changes.
• No new PII added or SDK only sends newly added PII if sendDefaultPII is enabled.
• I updated the docs if needed.
• I updated the wizard if needed.
• Review from the native team if needed.
• No breaking change or entry added to the changelog.
• No breaking change for hybrid SDKs or communicated to hybrid SDKs.

[lcian]

NOTE: to review this I would recommend just looking at the diff between the first commit in the PR and the last one, the first commit is porting the code we have for v3 to v4
i.e. use this to review: https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-java/pull/4166/files/4fac45da4ca55a72121135b0b641c209da0a4661..59977875b26d512fa23f365827ec5f1b8077e367

[github-actions]

Performance metrics 🚀

	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
Startup time	392.31 ms	455.23 ms	62.92 ms
Size	1.58 MiB	2.21 MiB	641.48 KiB

Baseline results on branch: main

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
c2c78de	415.28 ms	505.08 ms	89.80 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
c2c78de	1.58 MiB	2.21 MiB	640.27 KiB

Previous results on branch: lcian/feat/apollo-4

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
b6f49c8	347.02 ms	419.10 ms	72.08 ms
afa0712	379.70 ms	463.00 ms	83.30 ms
98d90f9	410.86 ms	515.15 ms	104.29 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
b6f49c8	1.58 MiB	2.21 MiB	641.11 KiB
afa0712	1.58 MiB	2.21 MiB	641.06 KiB
98d90f9	1.58 MiB	2.21 MiB	641.09 KiB

[markushi]

NOTE: to review this I would recommend just looking at the diff between the first commit in the PR and the last one, the first commit is porting the code we have for v3 to v4
i.e. use this to review: 4fac45da..59977875 (#4166)

I mainly reviewed exactly that, looks good to me! Do you think we should release this in an alpha version first?

[lcian]

I mainly reviewed exactly that, looks good to me! Do you think we should release this in an alpha version first?

Thanks @markushi !
I've tested this manually too and I don't see any way this could break customer's code, so I think we could release it in a regular version. Please let me know if you think otherwise.

[adinauer]

Since this adds a new module and doesn't change existing code I think it's safe to release without an alpha as the only customers affected are those explicitly using the new Apollo 4 dependency and actively configuring it to be used.

[adinauer]

Deferring to @lbloder for a review here since he wrote the integration for v3.

[lbloder]

LGTM, nicely done 👍

To make the CI run successfully, you'll need to run make api once locally and push the changes.

[lcian]

Thanks for kickstarting this @cvb941 !

[cvb941]

thanks @lcian for the work here, I hope many people will use the updated Apollo integration as well 😊