Skip to content

pipeline: outputs: azure_blob: add log_key to outputs#1540

Open
tomekwilk wants to merge 2 commits into
fluent:masterfrom
tomekwilk:master
Open

pipeline: outputs: azure_blob: add log_key to outputs#1540
tomekwilk wants to merge 2 commits into
fluent:masterfrom
tomekwilk:master

Conversation

@tomekwilk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@tomekwilk tomekwilk commented Jan 2, 2025

Matching fluent/fluent-bit PR fluent/fluent-bit#9791

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lockewritesdocs lockewritesdocs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution @tomekwilk! Suggested a minor edit, but LGTM otherwise.

Comment thread pipeline/outputs/azure_blob.md Outdated
@khalillilahk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey @tomekwilk @lockewritesdocs,
Just wanted to follow up on this PR, are there any issues preventing it from getting merged?

@eschabell eschabell self-assigned this Oct 21, 2025
@eschabell
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@khalillilahk these doc changes can only be applied once the code PR fluent/fluent-bit#9791 is merged, I've nudged the code owner over there as there are changes needed to that PR.

@eschabell
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@tomekwilk I've nudged you on the code PR fluent/fluent-bit#9791, once that's merged this one is ready to go if you fix the conflicts in this doc PR.

@eschabell eschabell added conflict Waiting on conflict to be resolved by contributor waiting-for-user Waiting for user/contributors feedback or requested changes labels Oct 21, 2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wilk <thomas.wilk@cohesity.com>
@eschabell eschabell added 4.2.1 and removed 4.2.1 waiting-for-user Waiting for user/contributors feedback or requested changes conflict Waiting on conflict to be resolved by contributor labels Dec 3, 2025
Signed-off-by: Eric D. Schabell <eric@schabell.org>
@eschabell eschabell self-requested a review as a code owner May 27, 2026 10:17
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented May 27, 2026

Warning

Review limit reached

@eschabell, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 23 minutes and 19 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: eb755956-fac3-414f-85ae-b9a8c97429a4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5231934 and 18b9e90.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pipeline/outputs/azure_blob.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@eschabell
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Resolved conflicts for @tomekwilk.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@eschabell eschabell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Waiting only on code PR merge @tomekwilk

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants