Automate dependencies update

[neil-morrison44]

• Haven't updated the generated sources yet
• Not sure if 47 or 46 is the best choice for the runtime
• Might be some other flatpak things missing
• Updates the patch
• Fixes Flatpak depends on outdate and unsafe runtime #83

[flathubbot]

Started test build 152225

[flathubbot]

Build 152225 failed

[flathubbot]

Started test build 152236

[flathubbot]

Started test build 152238

[flathubbot]

Build 152236 failed

[flathubbot]

Build 152238 failed

[flathubbot]

Started test build 152245

[hadess]

I've picked up the updated patch, the node and runtime updates into #141 along with the updated dependencies.

We can re-purpose this one to be about the automatic dependency updater. I have the same questions as just under flathub/tech.feliciano.pocket-casts#8 (comment) about whether we're allowed to do that in Flatpak repos, in general.

About the metadata changes, happy to include the textual changes if you have a separate PR for it. The screenshots however don't match the guidelines, they should use the default window manager settings (presumably, GNOME here):
https://docs.flathub.org/docs/for-app-authors/metainfo-guidelines/quality-guidelines/#screenshots

[flathubbot]

Build 152245 failed

[flathubbot]

Started test build 152250

[flathubbot]

Started test build 152252

[flathubbot]

Build 152250 failed

[flathubbot]

Build 152252 failed

[neil-morrison44]

@hadess Thanks for that, struggling with this one.

Screenshots should be fine I think - it's a fresh Ubuntu install & the only thing specified is "Take screenshots on Linux" rather than a particular distro.
Will need to add captions to them though to follow the guideline.

[hadess]

We can re-purpose this one to be about the automatic dependency updater. I have the same questions as just under flathub/tech.feliciano.pocket-casts#8 (comment) about whether we're allowed to do that in Flatpak repos, in general.

Discussion is here:
https://discourse.flathub.org/t/using-github-actions-workflow-to-update-deps/7816