Conversation
…d numeric filters (gt, gte, lt, lte)
Summary of ChangesHello @shrutip90, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the trace filtering capabilities within the system, particularly for the developer UI. It introduces the ability to filter traces based on multiple equality or inequality conditions using arrays, and adds robust numeric comparison operators for fields like start/end times. These changes provide more granular control and flexibility when searching and analyzing trace data. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request successfully implements array-based inclusion/exclusion filters and numeric comparison filters for trace queries. The logic correctly handles the OR-ing of multiple values in eq filters and the AND-ing of multiple values in neq filters. The addition of numeric filters (gt, gte, lt, lte) is well-implemented and tested. I've provided a suggestion to refactor the filtering logic in file-trace-store.ts to be more concise and slightly more efficient by reducing repeated object key lookups and logic duplication.
While implementing filtering on dev UI, I was having issues doing neq filter for type along with the "Show only Genkit traces" since that needs a second neq filter. So I have modified the eq/neq filters to take arrays instead to check for multiple eq conditions that will be ORed and multiple neq conditions that will be ANDed.
Also, added numeric filters (gt, gte, lt, lte) that can be used to perform time range filtering on dev UI.
Related to #4439
Checklist (if applicable):