Skip to content

Conversation

@reese
Copy link
Collaborator

@reese reese commented Jan 7, 2026

Reverts #766

Copy link
Collaborator

@froydnj froydnj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is fine by me. I wish we had more testcases around this stuff.

idk if you have a post-prism checklist, but perhaps this testcase, slightly altered, would be a good candidate for committing after ripper disappears.

@reese
Copy link
Collaborator Author

reese commented Jan 7, 2026

We can just leave it around as a Prism-specific test if that's worthwhile, I can revert the old change but leave parser-specific outputs

@reese
Copy link
Collaborator Author

reese commented Jan 7, 2026

(Actually I'll do this in a separate PR, I'm gonna try and make a few test cases for this and try to dial in where they differ)

@reese reese merged commit a600afe into trunk Jan 7, 2026
8 checks passed
@reese reese deleted the revert-766-reese-array-multilining branch January 7, 2026 14:50
@froydnj
Copy link
Collaborator

froydnj commented Jan 7, 2026

Oh, that's right, I forgot about the denylists for tests. That'd be great!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants