Skip to content

Conversation

@kakserpom
Copy link
Contributor

@kakserpom kakserpom commented Feb 8, 2026

Fixes #184 and #376

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 8, 2026

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 21973862764

Details

  • 8 of 75 (10.67%) changed or added relevant lines in 6 files are covered.
  • 3 unchanged lines in 2 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 35.019%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
src/describe/stub.rs 0 1 0.0%
crates/macros/src/impl_.rs 0 3 0.0%
src/builders/module.rs 0 17 0.0%
crates/macros/src/class.rs 0 46 0.0%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
src/class.rs 1 23.53%
crates/macros/src/class.rs 2 29.52%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 21948931825: -0.3%
Covered Lines: 2216
Relevant Lines: 6328

💛 - Coveralls

@kakserpom kakserpom force-pushed the 184_missing_property_types_in_stubs branch from 7de9f93 to 31579a5 Compare February 10, 2026 02:59
@kakserpom kakserpom force-pushed the 184_missing_property_types_in_stubs branch 3 times, most recently from bf7e6f0 to 4d7841d Compare February 12, 2026 16:15
@kakserpom kakserpom force-pushed the 184_missing_property_types_in_stubs branch from 4d7841d to ca5a27e Compare February 13, 2026 03:41
@kakserpom kakserpom force-pushed the 184_missing_property_types_in_stubs branch from ca5a27e to 7a90f8b Compare February 13, 2026 03:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[stubs] missing type declarations for properties

3 participants