✨ feat(tests): EIP-7928 tests targeting EIP-7002

[raxhvl]

🗒️ Description

This PR add tests for the effects of EIP-7002 exit on EIP-7928.

🔗 Related Issues or PRs

N/A.

✅ Checklist

• All: Ran fast tox checks to avoid unnecessary CI fails, see also Code Standards and Enabling Pre-commit Checks:

  uvx tox -e static

• All: PR title adheres to the repo standard - it will be used as the squash commit message and should start type(scope):.
• All: Considered adding an entry to CHANGELOG.md.
• All: Considered updating the online docs in the ./docs/ directory.
• All: Set appropriate labels for the changes (only maintainers can apply labels).

Cute Animal Picture

    |
    \\ A _.-''.-""
    /`''`    /
   |__  @)   |
    '-....--'\
              \
              |

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (eips/amsterdam/eip-7928@87cba98). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                    Coverage Diff                     @@
##             eips/amsterdam/eip-7928    #1918   +/-   ##
==========================================================
  Coverage                           ?   86.25%           
==========================================================
  Files                              ?      538           
  Lines                              ?    34561           
  Branches                           ?     3224           
==========================================================
  Hits                               ?    29809           
  Misses                             ?     4165           
  Partials                           ?      587           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	86.25% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[fselmo]

@raxhvl this lgtm. I suspect there is a lot of overlap with the Prague 7002 tests that clients will have to agree on the BAL for but I think some smaller subset of those tests with BAL expectations is a good thing to have for readability of expectations - especially mapping out the expectation for no_withdrawal_requests.

I think this is pretty comprehensive for 7002 tests 👌🏼. I just made one small fix balance_changes -> balance in Account classes (here) but the values there were correct and didn't break any test filling.