Skip to content

Conversation

@qu0b
Copy link
Contributor

@qu0b qu0b commented Dec 12, 2025

Geth is failing many tests as the BPOs 1 and 2 are hard coded

fselmo and others added 30 commits December 8, 2025 15:22
fix(tests): Fix Amsterdam filling after rebase
fix(specs): Fix issues with new ruff + mypy rules after rebase

- bal -> block_access_list; re-add custom rlp encoding for block access list
- bytes to uint
- move away from method-style

- Update EIP-7928 implementation: system contracts at index 0, migrate to RLP
  - System contracts (parent hash, beacon root) now use block_access_index 0
  - Transactions use block_access_index 1 to len(transactions)
  - Post-execution changes use block_access_index len(transactions) + 1
  - Migrated from SSZ to RLP encoding as per updated EIP-7928 spec
  - Updated all tests to match new API and structure
  - Replaced tx_index with block_access_index throughout codebase

- add system contract logic
- add markdown docstrings
- update BAL format; address comments
- ssz encoding and bal validation
- six ssz types
- bal tests
- balspecs

fix: do not track setting empty code to a new account (ethereum#19)
fix: track implicit SLOAD within SSTORE for OOG cases (ethereum#18)
refactor: Put back explicit acct tracking outside 7702 delegation path (ethereum#17)
fix non-tracked 7702 authority for invalid delegations (ethereum#16)
    * fix non-tracked 7702 authority for invalid delegations
    * fix: lint issues
    * fix: track delegation target when loaded as call target
    * fix: track delegation target when loaded as call target from call
      opcodes
    * chore: fix issues with documentation generation

Fix self-destruct cases with pre-execution balance cache / tracking
    * fix self-destruct implementation
    * fix self-destruct tracking balance
    * fix it in the bal finalization by filtering
    * add balance reset and fix tests
    * simplify pre-balance tracking not using snapshots

fix duplicated code entries for in transaction self destruct
fix self destruct in same transaction bug
fix call/delagate call tracking bug
fix zero-value transfer tracking (ethereum#6)
    * fix zero-value transfer tracking
    * fix reverted frame tracking
    * rename variables
    * fix missing addresses bug
    * fix: docs run & move imports to top of file

refactor: move rlp_utils to block_access_lists; bal -> block_access_lists
Some remaining fixes due to large refactor in `forks/osaka`:

- Move BALs from amsterdam -> forks/amsterdam
- rename: build -> build_block_access_list
- fix docc issues

move state change tracker to State

correct system contract addresses

Fixes to communicate with BALs EEST branch:

- fix(bal): Initialize the state tracker before system contract calls

- We were missing system contract calls to beacon roots and history
  contracts. This change initializes the state tracker before system
  contract calls and passes the tracker to these calls if post-Amsterdam.

- fix(docs): Fix issues with toxenvs: lint, doc, json_infra
- fix(t8n): Only initialize the bal_change_tracker for amsterdam
- feat(fork criteria): Index upcoming forks for better ordering / fix issues
- chore(forks): Fix issues from lint after rebase with Osaka latest
- fix(setuptools): Update packages to include amsterdam
- chore(lint): Fix 'tox -e static' issues

- Fix bug in tracker
  Manually cherry-picked from e72991b
  Author: nerolation

- chore(tests): Attempt to resolve issues with CI tests
- chore(lint): fix issues from running ``tox -e static`` locally
- refactor(bal): Send BAL as a list over t8n tool
- fix(amsterdam): Add change tracker to state test in t8n
- chore(lint,tests): Fix tests after moving bal from osaka -> amsterdam
- chore(forks): Move bals from Osaka to Amsterdam
- chore(lint): Fix lint issues

- refactor(bal): Send the full bal object and bal_hash over t8n

  - If we send the full object over JSON, we can model_validate() on ESST.
  - If we send the hash, once we fill the pydantic model, we can get the rlp
    and the hash and validate that our objects match while only really
    validating the parts of the BAL we are interested in for each test.

- chore: point to working eest branch
- chore(bals): Remove unused SSZ utils.py
  The SSZ implementation is no longer needed as we are now using RLP
- refactor(bals): Clean up BAL module types and imports
  - Bytes -> Bytes32 type for storage slots
  - Remove unused imports / fix imports / fix linting
  - Update function signatures to match tracker

- fix(bals-tx-index): Track bal indexes in t8n
  Keep track of BAL index state in t8n
* fix(specs): Fix zero value withdrawals BAL tracking

* docs(specs): rename 'finalize' to 'normalize' in comments

* docs(specs): remove reference to uint128 for balance tracking

---------

Co-authored-by: Toni Wahrstätter <51536394+nerolation@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Toni Wahrstätter <info@toniwahrstaetter.com>
refactor(tests): Prevent skips by splitting tests appropriately

fix(tests): Use valid inputs to precompile tests

chore(tests): linting fixes

feat(tests): EIP-7928 test_bal_storage_write_read_cross_frame

feat(tests): EIP-7928 test_bal_storage_write_read_same_frame

feat(tests): EIP-7928 test_bal_nonexistent_account_access

feat(tests): EIP-7928 test_bal_nonexistent_value_transfer

feat(tests): EIP-7928 test_bal_precompiles

feat(tests): EIP-7928 test_bal_withdrawal_to_coinbase_empty_block

feat(tests): EIP-7928 test_bal_withdrawal_to_coinbase

feat(tests): EIP-7928 test_bal_withdrawal_largest_amount

feat(tests): EIP-7928 test_bal_withdrawal_to_precompiles

fix(tests): expectation for nonexistent account in post

fix(specs,tests): Fix withdrawal tests for BALs issue with idx==0

- `self.txs.successfully_parsed` is a list of transaction indexes, not
  transactions. The "if tx" check here would then check `if 0` which
  parses as a boolean ``False``. This means we would skip counting the tx
  if index=0 was successful.

- Fixes some test expectations where `post_code` was being checked instead
  of ``new_code``.

feat(tests): EIP-7928 test_bal_zero_withdrawal

feat(tests): EIP-7928 test_bal_withdrawal_and_new_contract

feat(tests): EIP-7928 test_bal_withdrawal_and_selfdestruct

feat(tests): EIP-7928 test_bal_multiple_withdrawals_same_address

feat(tests): EIP-7928 withdrawal_and_value_transfer_same_address

feat(tests): EIP-7928 withdrawal_and_state_access_same_account

feat(tests): EIP-7928 test_bal_withdrawal_no_evm_execution

feat(tests): EIP-7928 test_bal_withdrawal_to_nonexistent_account

feat(tests): EIP-7928 test_bal_withdrawal_empty_block

feat(tests): EIP-7928 test_bal_withdrawal_with_transaction

feat(tests): EIP-7928 coinbase
…1743)

- Perform a similar check to balance changes and other
  tracker methods and keep only the last write.
ethereum#1742)

- Validate static checks on the t8n BAL if it exists
- IF the expectation also exists, validate against the expectation

Keep these checks separate as this helps validation now that we fill
for all tests, regardless if they have an expectation or not.
Co-authored-by: spencer spencer.taylor-brown@ethereum.org
 - add commit_transaction_frame() - no net-zero filtering
   for cross-tx changes
 - keep max nonce per transaction when building BAL, remove
   block-level code filtering
 - filter net-zero code changes at tracking time
   (for 7702 txs)
 - use commit_transaction_frame() instead of
   merge_on_success() for tx->block commits
fselmo and others added 21 commits December 8, 2025 18:56
- Calculate all gas that we can without state access and check this
  gas before ever accessing state. This is the most sensible way for
  an implementation to behave and indeed was revealed to be the way
  clients are behaving, which differed from the specs.

- Use fork.gas_costs to calculate gas costs, NOT hard-coded values.

- Create a BAL expectation for the test that yielded discrepancies
  between clients and specs so this doesn't slip through again.
  Document this test in `test_cases.md`.
…ereum#1841)

* refactor(spec-specs): Refactor state changes and their frames

* chore(spec-specs): cleanup BAL logic; organize gas check for SSTORE

* refactor(spec-specs): Changes from comments on PR ethereum#1841

* enhance: don't set defaults for state_changes
* fix(spec): update BAL type

* fix(tests): run amsterdam jsons

* fix(test-specs): Add BAL to genesis beyond Amsterdam fork

---------

Co-authored-by: fselmo <fselmo2@gmail.com>
* rebase onto upstream

* chore(fix) balance check in call before target access

* merge test cases with usptream

* merge test cases with usptream

* chore(fix) format with ruff

* chore(fix) revert call changes and add target to bal

* merge test cases with usptream

* improve wording

* chore(formate) fix formatting and line length

* refactor(test-tests): Use pre API where possible; explicit check for none in BAL

* refactor(test-tests): Refactor opcode tests to bal opcodes test file

---------

Co-authored-by: fselmo <fselmo2@gmail.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.85%. Comparing base (3a85f3d) to head (d0726cc).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                   Coverage Diff                    @@
##           eips/amsterdam/eip-7928    #1908   +/-   ##
========================================================
  Coverage                    83.85%   83.85%           
========================================================
  Files                          402      402           
  Lines                        25105    25105           
  Branches                      2287     2287           
========================================================
  Hits                         21051    21051           
  Misses                        3615     3615           
  Partials                       439      439           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 83.85% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@fselmo
Copy link
Contributor

fselmo commented Dec 12, 2025

I'd like to wait on this until maybe next release. We are just now moving into a new system for filling tests with BPOs and this seems like it's just a trick to please Geth and no other client. So I'd rather wait to include this until we align everything on the testing side and with all client expectations for the BAL tests.

@fselmo fselmo force-pushed the eips/amsterdam/eip-7928 branch 2 times, most recently from be73122 to ba0eec1 Compare December 17, 2025 22:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants