-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.1k
Add unaccent to SearchFilter
#9385
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
mgaligniana
wants to merge
9
commits into
encode:main
Choose a base branch
from
mgaligniana:add-unaccent-to-search-filter
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+53
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
deb6657
Add `unaccent` to `SearchFilter`
mgaligniana fb3b63a
Setup CI to run tests with Postgres
browniebroke 69967f9
Add test for `unaccent` filter
mgaligniana a06a08b
Merge branch 'main' into add-unaccent-to-search-filter
browniebroke dcda6df
Merge branch 'main' into add-unaccent-to-search-filter
auvipy 406adf9
Merge branch 'main' into add-unaccent-to-search-filter
browniebroke 8a854bc
Add UnaccentExtension
browniebroke de96fd4
Remove PG extension creation from GHA
browniebroke 0ad7873
Merge branch 'main' into add-unaccent-to-search-filter
browniebroke File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Turns out this is doing a match on the full string, hence why the tests don't pass... We should probably change this to
unaccent__icontains.I suppose some folks will probably want to have similar
istartswithandiexactunaccented variants.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We might be better off using a dedicated class for unaccent searches (not tested, I assume that's how it works):
And change the base
SearchFilterclass to make the default lookup easier to override in subclasses:django-rest-framework/rest_framework/filters.py
Lines 107 to 108 in 156bd5d
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @browniebroke! I I can try to do an approach to test it, if you'd like!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes sure 😊