Skip to content

Rdmkit fr#1766

Merged
bedroesb merged 23 commits intoelixir-europe:masterfrom
SalihaZ:rdmkit_fr
Feb 1, 2026
Merged

Rdmkit fr#1766
bedroesb merged 23 commits intoelixir-europe:masterfrom
SalihaZ:rdmkit_fr

Conversation

@SalihaZ
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@SalihaZ SalihaZ commented Jan 8, 2026

Updating the national resources page and the the tool-resource file

Comment thread _data/tool_and_resource_list.yml Outdated
name: FAIR-Checker
registry:
biotools: FAIR-Checker
url: https://bio.tools/fair-checker/
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do not use the bio.tools url as a url, since it is already linked as registry

@bedroesb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

bedroesb commented Jan 10, 2026

@SalihaZ thank you for your contributions! I see currently lots of duplication between the tools added in the All tools and resources table and the french national page.

Some guide lines;

  • Either a tool or resource is national - or a generic tool, it can not be both at the same time. In this case I think multiple additions in the all tools and resources list in this PR can be removed.
  • Every general Tool or resource that gets added needs to be put in context in a non-national page using the tool snippet (see our contribute guidelines)
  • Tools or resources tailored towards France should be listed in the metadata of French page ( for example: Cat OPIDoR, DSW@IFB, usegalaxy-fr, ...) this looks fine!
  • To list the involvement of France in general tools, you can list their tool-id under: ref_to_main_resources. I see you did so, but I am suprised the existing entries get removed 🤔

Comment thread _data/tool_and_resource_list.yml Outdated
name: The Committee for Open Science
registry:
fairsharing:
url: https://www.ouvrirlascience.fr/the-committee-for-open-science/
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is not a tool or resource, to determine what a tool or resource is, please follow: https://rdmkit.elixir-europe.org/tool_resource_update#when-can-you-add-a-new-tool-or-resource

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bedroesb Thanks very much for the reviewing and for clarifying the guidelines. I’ll update the PR accordingly.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@SalihaZ SalihaZ Jan 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Part of my confusion came from existing examples such as MadBot.
MadBot is developed in France and is listed in the All tools and resources table and referenced from a non-national page (the Biodiversity domain), but it does not appear on the French national resources page. This made it less clear to me whether such tools should be treated as national or generic in RDMkit.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bedroesb bedroesb Jan 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In order to list them on the fr page please use ref_to_main_resources, this is also why phis and faidare are listed there.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@SalihaZ SalihaZ Jan 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bedroesb I have a question concerning FAIR-Checker which is a tool mentioned in the IFB tool assembly page but isn’t in tool_and_resource_list.yml nor on the French page.
Should it be added to the main YAML as a generic tool, and not listed on the French national resources page?
Tanks a lot for your help

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This would make sense to add to the all tools and resources list, and refer to it from the IFB tool assembly page using the tool snippet. If activity developed by France, you can also list the id using ref_to_main_resources.

Let me know if you need help with cleaning up the all tools and resources list.

registry:
fairsharing:
url: https://entrepot.recherche.data.gouv.fr/
- description: EDAM is a structured ontology of key concepts used in scientific data analysis and data management, covering topics, operations, data types, identifiers, and formats. It enables consistent semantic annotation and categorisation of scientific resources and supports provenance documentation in data management.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment thread _data/tool_and_resource_list.yml Outdated
Comment thread pages/national_resources/fr_resources.md Outdated
Comment on lines -8 to -9
- phis
- faidare
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you sure these can be removed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@SalihaZ SalihaZ Jan 13, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, they can be removed as they are already listed in the plant phenomics tool assembly page : https://rdmkit.elixir-europe.org/plant_phenomics_assembly

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

listing them like this gives acknowledgement that France is involved in the development of these resources. One does not exclude the other.

Comment thread pages/national_resources/fr_resources.md Outdated
Comment thread pages/national_resources/fr_resources.md Outdated
SalihaZ and others added 6 commits January 12, 2026 16:02
Co-authored-by: Bert Droesbeke <44875756+bedroesb@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bert Droesbeke <44875756+bedroesb@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bert Droesbeke <44875756+bedroesb@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bert Droesbeke <44875756+bedroesb@users.noreply.github.com>
@bedroesb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think something went wrong in the _data/tool_and_resource_list.yml changes since duplications are happening and the new tools that got added are not at the bottom anymore/got mixed up. a cleanup will need to happen I am afraid.

@SalihaZ SalihaZ requested a review from floradanna as a code owner January 15, 2026 13:12
@bedroesb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This starts to look good! DOn't forget to mention "software-heritage" as a tool somewhere on RDMkit like you did for EDAM :)

@SalihaZ
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

SalihaZ commented Jan 19, 2026

Thanks a lot for the feedback, and sorry for the earlier confusion. It was due to a commit mistake on my side and a rebase that temporarily mixed the local and remote versions of _data/tool_and_resource_list.yml.
I’m glad to hear it’s starting to look good :)
Thanks a lot for your patience.

@SalihaZ
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

SalihaZ commented Jan 19, 2026

@bedroesb where do you think it would be most appropriate to mention Software Heritage in RDMkit?
I was thinking of adding it either in:
Data storage → Where should you store the data after the end of the project?
or another section you would recommend?

Comment thread pages/your_tasks/storage.md Outdated
* Estimate the volume of the (meta)data files that need to be preserved after the end of the project. Consider using a compressed file format to minimize the data volume.
* Define the amount of time (hours, days…) that you could wait in case the data needs to be reanalysed in the future.
* It is a good practice to publish your data in public data repositories. Usually, data publication in repositories is a requirement for scientific journals and funders. Repositories preserve your data for a long time, sometimes for free. See our [Data publication page](data_publication) for more information.
* It is a good practice to publish your data in public data repositories. Usually, data publication in repositories is a requirement for scientific journals and funders. Repositories preserve your data for a long time, sometimes for free. To ensure long-term preservation and citation of software used in your project, you can leverage {% tool "software-heritage" %}, an archive of source code that supports reproducible science, open access, and sustainable reuse. See our [Data publication page](data_publication) for more information.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would maybe make sa separate bullet point for it, since "See our Data publication page for more information" points to a page that does not have software-heritage described. But the content reviewers might have a different opinion, I just review from a technical/guideline standpoint :)

@bedroesb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

image

This is how it currently looks like! @Nazeeefa @floradanna @diana-pilvar @wittigue can take it from here :)

@bedroesb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I see on the screenshot, that not all descriptions of the tools have a nice sentence, or start with a capital. Could you adapt them to have a self standing description?

@bedroesb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

and make sure that if one of the resources tailored to France is not accessible to everyone, to specify using the how_to_access field to describe which login they need, for example "You need a french institutional account."

Comment thread _data/tool_and_resource_list.yml Outdated
id: edam
name: EDAM ontology
registry:
fairsharing:
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
fairsharing:
fairsharing: a6r7zs

Comment thread _data/tool_and_resource_list.yml Outdated
id: software-heritage
name: Software Heritage
registry:
fairsharing:
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
fairsharing:
fairsharing: 6ffb92

national_resources:
- name: Cat OPIDoR
description: Catalog of national services and tools that support research data management designed to assist researchers, data stewards, and institutions.
how_to_access: Create an account
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry if I was not clear, I meant that if a service is only accessible with French citizenship/a French institutional account/ ... This needs to be filled in. If everyone can create an account, this field should be left empty. Sorry if I caused any confusion!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah ok! no problem, I'll fix that

- madbot
- edam
- galaxy
- fair-checker
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bedroesb bedroesb Jan 26, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fair-checker is being listed a a national tool below. Either remove it here, or at it as a general tool in the tools and resources and link towards it from a non-national page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@SalihaZ SalihaZ Jan 27, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review, it was an oversight. I've fixed it

Comment on lines +4 to +5
contributors: [Saliha Zenboudji-Beddek, Olivier Collin, Nadia Goué]
coordinators: [Anne-Françoise Adam-Blondon, Jean-François Dufayard, Jacques Van Helden]
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be possible to add metadata (email, affiliation, ORCID) to the newly added coordinators/contributors? Make sure to use the exact same name: https://github.com/elixir-europe/rdmkit/blob/master/_data/CONTRIBUTORS.yaml

(and if a contributor is not already present)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SalihaZ this is the last comment preventing this merge :) (I think!) Thank you for hanging in there. We just had a look at this PR in our editorial board meeting.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@SalihaZ SalihaZ Jan 31, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bedroesb OK! I've just add all the contributors. Thank you so much for your help.

@bedroesb bedroesb merged commit 965a520 into elixir-europe:master Feb 1, 2026
3 checks passed
@bedroesb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

bedroesb commented Feb 1, 2026

Thank you for your contributions!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants