-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
add component to requirement for future fix of meta model #524
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
65555d5
93918e6
fc6fd81
b6356f3
8940350
0448ebb
7beebaa
c2db6f2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. .. comp_req:: Some Title belongs_to/fulfils is the same, compare also feature same
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't understand that sentence. belongs_to means a requirement belongs to a component. Fulfils are no linktype for comp_req. It have only satisfies (to feature requirement). |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ Component Requirements | |
| :safety: ASIL_B | ||
| :satisfies: feat_req__feature_name__some_title | ||
| :status: invalid | ||
| :belongs_to: comp__component_name_template | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Seems related to here, #515, first time introduce belogns_to, now in templates, and will be there anothr PR to add it to the process requirements, If would expect, that such a major chang is introduced in ONE PR, otherwise it is really difficult to follow that up
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. No, that's comes with the update of the meta model in december. The update of the picture is only for introduction of the logic interfaces in the picture which are there since a long time. See https://github.com/eclipse-score/docs-as-code/pull/331/files for introduction of the belongs_to.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Do not see any process requirements for that?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It is gd_req__arch_linkage_requirement. For that check this is necessary. Also the building block view requests that by "has". |
||
|
|
||
| The Component shall do xyz to another component to bring it to this condition at this time | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
.. comp_arc_sta:: Component Name (Static View)
🆔 comp_arc_sta__component_name__static_view
:security: YES
:safety: ASIL_B
:status: invalid
:includes: comp_arc_sta__component_name__2
Component architecture may optional, but if existing, shall be same as in picture, compare feature architecture