Added virtualization to Paginator Select #2297
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
Author
|
We can discuss the threshold in which we start virtualizing. |
PelayoFelgueroso
approved these changes
Oct 6, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
(Check off all the items before submitting)
/libdirectory./websiteas needed.Description
We already support virtualization for
SelectbutPaginatorwas not making use of it. I have defined a threshold in which arrays with size higher than 100, where the performance starts to become worse, it is appropiate to incorporate it, using avirtualHeightof 304px which is themax-heightthat we previously supported on the Select.Closes
OC-19102