Skip to content

Comments

Fixed SIGPIPE (exit code 141) in CI coverage threshold check.#2289

Merged
AlexSkrypnyk merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feature/update-threshold-ci-sigpipe
Feb 16, 2026
Merged

Fixed SIGPIPE (exit code 141) in CI coverage threshold check.#2289
AlexSkrypnyk merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feature/update-threshold-ci-sigpipe

Conversation

@AlexSkrypnyk
Copy link
Member

@AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk commented Feb 16, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Optimized code coverage extraction in CI/CD pipelines for improved efficiency.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 16, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉


Walkthrough

Two CI/CD configuration files are updated to simplify code coverage threshold extraction from cobertura XML. The grep command is refactored from a piped approach (grep -o ... | head -1) to a single invocation (grep -om1), maintaining identical functionality while reducing command complexity.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CI Coverage Extraction Optimization
.circleci/config.yml, .github/workflows/build-test-deploy.yml
Simplified line-rate extraction from cobertura XML by replacing grep -o piped to head -1 with grep -om1 to directly fetch the first matching pattern, reducing pipeline complexity without altering semantic behavior.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A grep here, a grep there,
From head to -om1 with care,
One match stands out, neat and bright,
Coverage flows, oh what a sight!
Simpler pipes make the pipeline right! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: fixing a SIGPIPE exit code 141 error in the CI coverage threshold check, which is reflected in both modified files where grep piping was simplified.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Merge Conflict Detection ✅ Passed ✅ No merge conflicts detected when merging into main

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/update-threshold-ci-sigpipe

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 76.91%. Comparing base (b7346aa) to head (142cb51).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2289      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.49%   76.91%   -0.58%     
==========================================
  Files         117      110       -7     
  Lines        6164     6005     -159     
  Branches       44        0      -44     
==========================================
- Hits         4777     4619     -158     
+ Misses       1387     1386       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions
Copy link

Code Coverage Report:
  2026-02-16 06:49:32

 Summary:
  Classes:  0.00% (0/1)
  Methods:  0.00% (0/2)
  Lines:   94.12% (176/187)

@AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk merged commit 39c4ff0 into main Feb 16, 2026
28 checks passed
@AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk deleted the feature/update-threshold-ci-sigpipe branch February 16, 2026 07:08
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from BACKLOG to Release queue in Vortex Feb 16, 2026
@AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk added this to the 1.36.0 milestone Feb 16, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Release queue

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant