Analysis: --log-for human|machine vs --output text|json design review
#1515
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Objective analysis of PR #1508's
--log-for human|machineflag design vs traditional--output text|jsonapproach.Recommendation
Keep
--log-for human|machine- audience-centric naming serves LLM-first use case better than format-centric alternatives.Key Findings
Why
--log-forWorks--help, no format reasoning requiredlogForconfig property in devproxyrc.jsonAcknowledged Tradeoffs
-o, Azure CLI--output)--output json|yaml|xmlWhy Tradeoffs Are Acceptable
Implementation Issues Identified
From PR review comments:
LogForproperty: read-only inIProxyConfiguration, settable inProxyConfiguration(inconsistent)LogForproperty inProxyConsoleFormatterOptionsunused byProxyConsoleFormatterFull Analysis
See
/tmp/pr-1508-analysis.mdfor detailed pros/cons comparison, comparative matrix, and alternative approaches.Original prompt
Created from VS Code.
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.