use astral-sh/ruff-action

[jschlyter]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Enhanced the GitHub workflow for improved command execution by adding a new linting check step.
  • Upgraded the underlying code quality tool used in our automated testing workflow to version 0.9.10 for improved linting and formatting checks.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

"""

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces enhancements to the GitHub workflow for the ruff job by adding a with block to specify the version parameter as latest and incorporating a new step to execute the command ruff check before the existing ruff format --check command. Additionally, the version of the ruff-pre-commit repository is updated from v0.9.3 to v0.9.10 in the .pre-commit-config.yaml file. No other configurations or steps within the workflow are altered.

Changes

File	Summary of Changes
.github/workflows/test.yml	Added with block for version in ruff job and included ruff check step before ruff format --check.
.pre-commit-config.yaml	Updated ruff-pre-commit version from v0.9.3 to v0.9.10.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant GHA as GitHub Actions
    participant Ruff as astral-sh/ruff-action@v3

    U->>GHA: Push commit
    GHA->>Ruff: Execute ruff check
    Ruff-->>GHA: Return linting results
    GHA->>Ruff: Execute ruff format --check
    Ruff-->>GHA: Return formatting results

Loading

Poem

I'm a rabbit with a coding beat,
Hopping through changes oh so neat.
With ruff now checking, all in line,
A version bump, our code will shine!
In the garden of code, we dance and play,
With every commit, we brighten the day! 🐇✨
"""

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 48e73d0 and c216ec4.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)

• poetry.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
• poetry.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

10-10: Switch to astral-sh/ruff-action@v3:
You've updated the ruff job to use astral-sh/ruff-action@v3 instead of the previous chartboost/ruff-action@v1. Please verify that the new action’s configuration and behavior align with your existing linting requirements. In particular, check for any changes in defaults or additional configuration options that might be needed in your workflow environment.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c37b2ad and b0092b9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.pre-commit-config.yaml (1)

1-20: Verify integration with PR objectives

The PR title indicates a switch to using astral-sh/ruff-action, yet this configuration still references astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit. Confirm that either there is an intended separation between the pre-commit configuration and the GitHub workflow changes (perhaps handled in another file) or update the title/documentation accordingly.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b0092b9 and 48e73d0.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• poetry.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
• .pre-commit-config.yaml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)

• .github/workflows/test.yml
• .github/workflows/test.yml
• .github/workflows/test.yml

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.pre-commit-config.yaml (1)

12-13: Upgrade to ruff-pre-commit v0.9.10

The repository version update from v0.9.3 to v0.9.10 is a positive change that should bring in improvements and bug fixes. Please verify that this version aligns with your local setup and any CI workflows.