Open
Conversation
This reverts commit f18f30c.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sequence diagram of current OnDiskGraphIndexWriter usage by Cassandra:
Cassandra_OnDiskGraphIndexWriter_CurrentState_SequenceDiagram.md
Sequence diagram of proposed future OnDiskParallelGraphIndexWriter usage:
OnDiskParallelGraphIndexWriter_SequenceDiagram.md
Perf test results:
refactor_parallel.tar.gz
Refactoring of the parallelization of graph index writer.
This PR splits the parallel writer into a separate class rather than maintaining if-based branches throughout a single class (OnDiskGraphIndexWriter). A large amount of common code has been abstracted into the new RandomAccessOnDiskGraphIndexWriter making the hierarchy cleaner and easier to understand and maintain.
Previously it was discovered that calling write() after calling writeInline() would results in the features from writeInline() being overwritten with zeroes. This is resolved in this case by checking for feature provider being null, emulating how it is done in sequential writes.