User status flags

[rogelioLpz]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Added four user status flags for managing inactive accounts, fraud marking, PLD blocking, and security mode.

• Chores

  • Package version bumped to 2.1.17.
  • Updated validation dependency to cuenca-validations 2.1.26.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 6a97163d-10ff-4631-875a-97e3a1a61c75

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dbde6c4 and a3d0a71.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• cuenca/version.py
• requirements.txt

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• requirements.txt

---

Walkthrough

Four boolean fields were added to the User model: is_inactive, is_fraud, is_pld_blocked, and is_security_mode (all default False). The User.update signature was extended to accept these four optional flags and they are passed into UserUpdateRequest. The User JSON example/schema was updated to include the new keys. The package version was bumped to 2.1.17 and cuenca-validations in requirements was updated to 2.1.26.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Add fiscal_regime_code field to User #425: Modifies cuenca/resources/users.py User model and update(...) to add and propagate new fields.
• Add blacklist_validation_status and pronouns fields to User class #434: Adds new User attributes and extends User.update to accept and propagate the same new fields.
• Enhance onboarding #426: Changes User.update signature and the construction of update requests for additional user fields.

Suggested reviewers

• alexviquez

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The pull request title 'User status flags' accurately summarizes the main changes, which add four new boolean status flags (is_inactive, is_fraud, is_pld_blocked, is_security_mode) to the User model.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings (stacked PR)
• 📝 Generate docstrings (commit on current branch)

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch user-flags

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (318496f) to head (a3d0a71).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #436   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           54        54           
  Lines         1194      1198    +4     
=========================================
+ Hits          1194      1198    +4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
cuenca/resources/users.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
cuenca/version.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 318496f...a3d0a71. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[coderabbitai]

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

cuenca/resources/users.py (1)

178-181: Add regression tests for None vs False semantics on update flags.

Given these are optional booleans, tests should explicitly cover omitted (None) and explicit False/True to prevent payload/behavior regressions.

Also applies to: 205-208

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 167327f5-e0d7-430f-8bee-fee91c855837

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 318496f and dbde6c4.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• cuenca/resources/users.py
• cuenca/version.py
• requirements.txt