build: bump clang-format from 22.1.0 to 22.1.1 in the clang-tools group

[dependabot]

Bumps the clang-tools group with 1 update: clang-format.

Updates clang-format from 22.1.0 to 22.1.1

Commits

• 5606b71 v22.1.1
• 949748d Merge pull request #153 from ssciwr/dependabot/github_actions/actions/downloa...
• 31f0fc0 Merge pull request #154 from ssciwr/dependabot/github_actions/actions/upload-...
• 781e306 Bump actions/upload-artifact from 6 to 7
• ecbc6ca Bump actions/download-artifact from 7 to 8
• See full diff in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore <dependency name> major version will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency's major version (unless you unignore this specific dependency's major version or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore <dependency name> minor version will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency's minor version (unless you unignore this specific dependency's minor version or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore <dependency name> will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency (unless you unignore this specific dependency or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot unignore <dependency name> will remove all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot unignore <dependency name> <ignore condition> will remove the ignore condition of the specified dependency and ignore conditions

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.41%. Comparing base (0e928ef) to head (680e46f).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #179   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.41%   95.41%           
=======================================
  Files           4        4           
  Lines         109      109           
=======================================
  Hits          104      104           
  Misses          5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 13.82%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 5 regressed benchmarks
✅ 55 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 13 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	test_run_clang_format_invalid[args0-1]	805.7 µs	928.7 µs	-13.24%
❌	test_run_clang_format_dry_run[args0-1]	803.2 µs	932.1 µs	-13.82%
❌	test_run_clang_format_valid[args0-expected_retval0]	972.7 µs	1,118.3 µs	-13.02%
❌	test_run_clang_format_verbose	977.4 µs	1,102 µs	-11.31%
❌	test_run_clang_format_verbose_error	906.6 µs	1,029.7 µs	-11.95%

---

_{Comparing dependabot/pip/clang-tools-020d6f1e22 (680e46f) with main (29b6022)²}

Footnotes

1. 13 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. No successful run was found on main (0e928ef) during the generation of this report, so 29b6022 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud