Skip to content

Conversation

@haakonvt
Copy link
Contributor

@haakonvt haakonvt commented Aug 27, 2025

@haakonvt haakonvt requested review from a team as code owners August 27, 2025 08:15
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 27, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 44.05215% with 1030 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 64.71%. Comparing base (e9e2c9e) to head (66518da).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
cognite/client/_api/data_modeling/instances.py 34.21% 75 Missing ⚠️
cognite/client/_api/datapoints.py 60.36% 65 Missing ⚠️
cognite/client/_api/assets.py 58.92% 46 Missing ⚠️
cognite/client/_api/files.py 65.00% 42 Missing ⚠️
...ognite/client/_api/extractionpipelines/__init__.py 24.48% 37 Missing ⚠️
cognite/client/_api/geospatial.py 40.32% 37 Missing ⚠️
cognite/client/_api/sequence_data.py 51.61% 30 Missing ⚠️
cognite/client/_api/sequences.py 41.17% 30 Missing ⚠️
cognite/client/_api/raw/rows.py 62.29% 23 Missing ⚠️
cognite/client/_api/time_series.py 39.47% 23 Missing ⚠️
... and 60 more

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (e9e2c9e) and HEAD (66518da). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (e9e2c9e) HEAD (66518da)
2 1
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2273       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   90.96%   64.71%   -26.26%     
===========================================
  Files         192      461      +269     
  Lines       26142    46668    +20526     
===========================================
+ Hits        23780    30199     +6419     
- Misses       2362    16469    +14107     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
cognite/client/_api/transformations/__init__.py 37.00% <ø> (-40.15%) ⬇️
cognite/client/_api/transformations/jobs.py 38.09% <ø> (-61.91%) ⬇️
...gnite/client/_api/transformations/notifications.py 6.45% <ø> (-84.18%) ⬇️
cognite/client/_api/transformations/schedules.py 28.57% <ø> (-67.43%) ⬇️
cognite/client/_api/transformations/schema.py 41.66% <ø> (-58.34%) ⬇️
cognite/client/_api/unit_system.py 14.28% <ø> (-85.72%) ⬇️
cognite/client/_api/units.py 62.35% <ø> (-37.65%) ⬇️
cognite/client/_api/user_profiles.py 10.71% <ø> (-67.86%) ⬇️
cognite/client/_api/vision.py 62.50% <ø> (-34.73%) ⬇️
cognite/client/_api/workflows/__init__.py 31.88% <ø> (-56.18%) ⬇️
... and 255 more

... and 193 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@haakonvt haakonvt force-pushed the v8-change-requests-to-httpx branch 2 times, most recently from 2c3e155 to 0bd9fb9 Compare September 1, 2025 13:01
@haakonvt haakonvt changed the title [V8] change requests to httpx refactor!: [V8] change requests to httpx Sep 1, 2025
@haakonvt haakonvt force-pushed the v8-change-requests-to-httpx branch 4 times, most recently from 96844be to 2dd42ec Compare September 10, 2025 14:34
@erlendvollset erlendvollset force-pushed the v8-change-requests-to-httpx branch from 2dd42ec to 67de20c Compare September 11, 2025 08:57
@haakonvt haakonvt force-pushed the v8-change-requests-to-httpx branch from 08e6e76 to 67de20c Compare September 17, 2025 11:26
@haakonvt haakonvt force-pushed the v8-change-requests-to-httpx branch 3 times, most recently from bfe3b98 to ea356d9 Compare September 20, 2025 21:15
@haakonvt haakonvt force-pushed the v8-change-requests-to-httpx branch from ea356d9 to 76173d0 Compare September 25, 2025 14:20
@haakonvt haakonvt force-pushed the v8-change-requests-to-httpx branch 7 times, most recently from 210018d to a5ac372 Compare October 3, 2025 09:28
@haakonvt haakonvt force-pushed the v8-change-requests-to-httpx branch from a5ac372 to fafe55c Compare October 6, 2025 21:26
@haakonvt haakonvt force-pushed the v8-change-requests-to-httpx branch from a36c976 to a24fa4c Compare December 9, 2025 10:13
@haakonvt haakonvt force-pushed the v8-change-requests-to-httpx branch 3 times, most recently from 270ac38 to e9439d4 Compare January 5, 2026 10:09
@haakonvt haakonvt force-pushed the v8-change-requests-to-httpx branch from e9439d4 to a470c70 Compare January 5, 2026 12:23
@haakonvt haakonvt force-pushed the v8-change-requests-to-httpx branch from 0ec9dc8 to f3af288 Compare January 5, 2026 12:49
@haakonvt haakonvt force-pushed the v8-change-requests-to-httpx branch from f3af288 to 1981df1 Compare January 5, 2026 13:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants