Skip to content

Add sparkle emoji to README title#842

Draft
codegen-sh[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
gen/e81eec7d-96bb-482f-96ce-8e2664ef5c93
Draft

Add sparkle emoji to README title#842
codegen-sh[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
gen/e81eec7d-96bb-482f-96ce-8e2664ef5c93

Conversation

@codegen-sh
Copy link
Contributor

@codegen-sh codegen-sh bot commented Mar 14, 2025

This PR adds sparkle emojis (✨) to the title section of the README to make it more visually appealing.

The change is simple but adds a nice touch to the documentation.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


codegen-bot seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@codegen-sh
Copy link
Contributor Author

codegen-sh bot commented Mar 14, 2025

Thanks for adding some visual flair to the README!

While sparkles (✨) are a nice touch, I have a few thoughts on the emoji choice:

  1. Consistency: The sparkle emoji appears on both sides of the text, which looks balanced, but we might want to consider if this matches our overall documentation style.

  2. Relevance: For a developer tool like Codegen, we might consider using more tech-oriented emojis like 🛠️ (tool), 🚀 (rocket), or 💻 (computer) that better represent the product's purpose.

  3. Minimalism: The current design is clean, and adding emojis might make it feel less professional for some audiences. We could consider using just one emoji at the beginning rather than bookending the text.

Overall, I like the initiative to make our documentation more engaging! Perhaps we could try a few different options to see what best represents Codegen's brand?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant