⚡️ Speed up function read_indexer_relationships by 35%#63
Open
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Open
⚡️ Speed up function read_indexer_relationships by 35%#63codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
read_indexer_relationships by 35%#63codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
The optimized code replaces the expensive `_prepare_records()` function call with `df.reset_index().itertuples(index=False, name="Row")`, which provides a **34% speedup** by eliminating DataFrame-to-dict conversion overhead.
**Key optimizations:**
1. **Eliminated intermediate dict conversion**: The original code called `_prepare_records()` which converted the entire DataFrame to a list of dictionaries using `df.to_dict("records")`. The optimized version uses `itertuples()` directly, avoiding this expensive conversion step.
2. **Faster row iteration**: `itertuples()` yields named tuples which are more memory-efficient and faster to access than dictionaries. However, the code converts each row to a dict via `row._asdict()` to maintain compatibility with the existing utility functions that expect dictionary-like objects.
3. **Replaced list comprehension with explicit loop**: Changed from a list comprehension to an explicit loop with `rels.append()`, which provides better performance characteristics for this use case.
The line profiler shows the optimization is most effective for the record preparation step, reducing time from 84.6ms to 40.1ms (53% improvement). The speedup is consistent across different test cases, showing **26-56% improvements** depending on DataFrame size and complexity. Larger datasets (1000+ rows) see around 26-27% improvement, while smaller datasets with varied data types achieve 40-56% speedups, making this optimization particularly valuable for typical relationship loading scenarios.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 35% (0.35x) speedup for
read_indexer_relationshipsingraphrag/query/indexer_adapters.py⏱️ Runtime :
22.5 milliseconds→16.7 milliseconds(best of30runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code replaces the expensive
_prepare_records()function call withdf.reset_index().itertuples(index=False, name="Row"), which provides a 34% speedup by eliminating DataFrame-to-dict conversion overhead.Key optimizations:
Eliminated intermediate dict conversion: The original code called
_prepare_records()which converted the entire DataFrame to a list of dictionaries usingdf.to_dict("records"). The optimized version usesitertuples()directly, avoiding this expensive conversion step.Faster row iteration:
itertuples()yields named tuples which are more memory-efficient and faster to access than dictionaries. However, the code converts each row to a dict viarow._asdict()to maintain compatibility with the existing utility functions that expect dictionary-like objects.Replaced list comprehension with explicit loop: Changed from a list comprehension to an explicit loop with
rels.append(), which provides better performance characteristics for this use case.The line profiler shows the optimization is most effective for the record preparation step, reducing time from 84.6ms to 40.1ms (53% improvement). The speedup is consistent across different test cases, showing 26-56% improvements depending on DataFrame size and complexity. Larger datasets (1000+ rows) see around 26-27% improvement, while smaller datasets with varied data types achieve 40-56% speedups, making this optimization particularly valuable for typical relationship loading scenarios.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-read_indexer_relationships-mglo59iqand push.