⚡️ Speed up function read_indexer_covariates by 96%#62
Open
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Open
⚡️ Speed up function read_indexer_covariates by 96%#62codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
read_indexer_covariates by 96%#62codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
The optimization replaces the expensive `_prepare_records()` function call with a more efficient direct row iteration approach. The key improvement is **eliminating the DataFrame-to-dict conversion bottleneck**.
**What changed:**
- Removed the `_prepare_records(df)` call that internally used `df.reset_index().rename().to_dict("records")`
- Replaced it with direct `df.itertuples(index=True, name=None)` iteration
- Added an inline `_row_dict()` function that converts each row tuple to a dictionary on-demand
**Why it's faster:**
- **Avoids expensive DataFrame operations**: The original code performed `reset_index()`, `rename()`, and `to_dict("records")` on the entire DataFrame upfront
- **Eliminates large intermediate data structures**: `to_dict("records")` creates a full list of dictionaries in memory, while the optimized version processes one row at a time
- **Reduces memory allocations**: `itertuples()` yields lightweight tuple objects instead of creating heavy dictionary objects for all rows at once
**Performance characteristics:**
The optimization shows consistent 72-154% speedup across all test cases, with particularly strong performance on:
- Large datasets (1000+ rows): 77-83% faster due to reduced memory pressure
- Simple cases with all columns present: 141-154% faster
- Edge cases with missing data: 127-166% faster
The line profiler confirms the bottleneck was in `_prepare_records()` (71.4% of original runtime), which is now replaced by the much faster `itertuples()` approach (43.6% of optimized runtime).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 96% (0.96x) speedup for
read_indexer_covariatesingraphrag/query/indexer_adapters.py⏱️ Runtime :
49.5 milliseconds→25.2 milliseconds(best of86runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization replaces the expensive
_prepare_records()function call with a more efficient direct row iteration approach. The key improvement is eliminating the DataFrame-to-dict conversion bottleneck.What changed:
_prepare_records(df)call that internally useddf.reset_index().rename().to_dict("records")df.itertuples(index=True, name=None)iteration_row_dict()function that converts each row tuple to a dictionary on-demandWhy it's faster:
reset_index(),rename(), andto_dict("records")on the entire DataFrame upfrontto_dict("records")creates a full list of dictionaries in memory, while the optimized version processes one row at a timeitertuples()yields lightweight tuple objects instead of creating heavy dictionary objects for all rows at oncePerformance characteristics:
The optimization shows consistent 72-154% speedup across all test cases, with particularly strong performance on:
The line profiler confirms the bottleneck was in
_prepare_records()(71.4% of original runtime), which is now replaced by the much fasteritertuples()approach (43.6% of optimized runtime).✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-read_indexer_covariates-mglnynmoand push.