⚡️ Speed up function get_zero_positions by 15%#61
Open
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Open
⚡️ Speed up function get_zero_positions by 15%#61codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
get_zero_positions by 15%#61codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
The optimization achieves a **14% speedup** by eliminating redundant operations within the main loop and moving preprocessing outside of it. **Key optimizations:** 1. **Pre-compute category and size values**: Instead of checking `if node_categories is None` and `if node_sizes is None` inside the loop for every node, the optimized version pre-processes these values once at the beginning. This eliminates 18,000+ conditional checks in the original profiler results. 2. **Batch string conversions**: Category values are converted to strings once using list comprehensions (`[str(int(cat)) for cat in node_categories]`) rather than calling `str(int(node_category))` for each node individually. 3. **List comprehension instead of append**: The optimized version uses list comprehensions to build the result list directly, which is more efficient than repeatedly calling `append()` on an initially empty list. **Performance impact by test case type:** - **Large-scale tests (999+ nodes)**: Show the best improvements (5-32% faster) because the preprocessing overhead is amortized across many nodes - **Small-scale tests (1-3 nodes)**: Show slight regressions (12-36% slower) due to the upfront preprocessing cost not being offset by the reduced per-node work - **Edge cases with None values**: Benefit significantly as the None checks are handled once instead of per-iteration The line profiler confirms this: the original code spent 29.7% of time in `NodePosition()` constructor calls within the loop, while the optimized version reduces this overhead through better data preparation and more efficient list construction patterns.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 15% (0.15x) speedup for
get_zero_positionsingraphrag/index/operations/layout_graph/zero.py⏱️ Runtime :
4.44 milliseconds→3.87 milliseconds(best of315runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization achieves a 14% speedup by eliminating redundant operations within the main loop and moving preprocessing outside of it.
Key optimizations:
Pre-compute category and size values: Instead of checking
if node_categories is Noneandif node_sizes is Noneinside the loop for every node, the optimized version pre-processes these values once at the beginning. This eliminates 18,000+ conditional checks in the original profiler results.Batch string conversions: Category values are converted to strings once using list comprehensions (
[str(int(cat)) for cat in node_categories]) rather than callingstr(int(node_category))for each node individually.List comprehension instead of append: The optimized version uses list comprehensions to build the result list directly, which is more efficient than repeatedly calling
append()on an initially empty list.Performance impact by test case type:
The line profiler confirms this: the original code spent 29.7% of time in
NodePosition()constructor calls within the loop, while the optimized version reduces this overhead through better data preparation and more efficient list construction patterns.✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests and Runtime
codeflash_concolic_3eu3lmds/tmp1ijlmd32/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_get_zero_positionscodeflash_concolic_3eu3lmds/tmp1ijlmd32/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_get_zero_positions_2To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-get_zero_positions-mglmz8nsand push.