⚡️ Speed up method Algorithms.fibonacci by 31%#1420
Closed
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoomni-javafrom
Closed
⚡️ Speed up method Algorithms.fibonacci by 31%#1420codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoomni-javafrom
Algorithms.fibonacci by 31%#1420codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoomni-javafrom
Conversation
The optimized code achieves a **31% runtime improvement** (from 4.91ms to 3.73ms) by replacing the exponential-time recursive Fibonacci algorithm with an **O(log n) fast-doubling iterative algorithm**. **Key Changes:** 1. **Algorithm Replacement**: The original recursive approach has O(φ^n) time complexity due to redundant recalculations of the same Fibonacci values. The optimized version uses the fast-doubling method, which computes F(n) in O(log n) time by processing the binary representation of n. 2. **How Fast-Doubling Works**: - Uses the mathematical identities: F(2k) = F(k) × (2×F(k+1) - F(k)) and F(2k+1) = F(k)² + F(k+1)² - Processes bits of n from most significant to least significant, doubling the index at each step - Depending on whether each bit is 0 or 1, selects either (F(2k), F(2k+1)) or (F(2k+1), F(2k+2)) 3. **Stack Usage**: Eliminates deep recursion (which for large n would cause stack overflow), replacing it with a simple loop that iterates ~log₂(n) times. **Why This Is Faster:** For even moderately-sized inputs, the recursive version performs exponentially many redundant calculations. For example, computing F(20) recursively makes ~21,891 function calls, while the optimized version makes only ~5 iterations (since log₂(20) ≈ 4.3). This dramatic reduction in operations directly translates to the observed 31% speedup. **Impact:** This optimization particularly benefits workloads computing Fibonacci numbers for n > 15, where the exponential cost of recursion becomes prohibitive. The improvement scales dramatically with larger inputs—while the 31% speedup is measured at a specific test case, the advantage grows exponentially as n increases.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 31% (0.31x) speedup for
Algorithms.fibonacciincode_to_optimize/java/src/main/java/com/example/Algorithms.java⏱️ Runtime :
4.91 milliseconds→3.73 milliseconds(best of5runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 31% runtime improvement (from 4.91ms to 3.73ms) by replacing the exponential-time recursive Fibonacci algorithm with an O(log n) fast-doubling iterative algorithm.
Key Changes:
Algorithm Replacement: The original recursive approach has O(φ^n) time complexity due to redundant recalculations of the same Fibonacci values. The optimized version uses the fast-doubling method, which computes F(n) in O(log n) time by processing the binary representation of n.
How Fast-Doubling Works:
Stack Usage: Eliminates deep recursion (which for large n would cause stack overflow), replacing it with a simple loop that iterates ~log₂(n) times.
Why This Is Faster:
For even moderately-sized inputs, the recursive version performs exponentially many redundant calculations. For example, computing F(20) recursively makes ~21,891 function calls, while the optimized version makes only ~5 iterations (since log₂(20) ≈ 4.3). This dramatic reduction in operations directly translates to the observed 31% speedup.
Impact:
This optimization particularly benefits workloads computing Fibonacci numbers for n > 15, where the exponential cost of recursion becomes prohibitive. The improvement scales dramatically with larger inputs—while the 31% speedup is measured at a specific test case, the advantage grows exponentially as n increases.
✅ Correctness verification report:
⚙️ Click to see Existing Unit Tests
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-Algorithms.fibonacci-mlbh5d2oand push.