Skip to content

⚡️ Speed up method Algorithms.fibonacci by 11%#1412

Closed
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoomni-javafrom
codeflash/optimize-Algorithms.fibonacci-mlbf0man
Closed

⚡️ Speed up method Algorithms.fibonacci by 11%#1412
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoomni-javafrom
codeflash/optimize-Algorithms.fibonacci-mlbf0man

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link
Contributor

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Feb 6, 2026

📄 11% (0.11x) speedup for Algorithms.fibonacci in code_to_optimize/java/src/main/java/com/example/Algorithms.java

⏱️ Runtime : 4.23 milliseconds 3.82 milliseconds (best of 5 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimized code achieves a 10% runtime improvement (from 4.23ms to 3.82ms) by replacing the O(n) iterative Fibonacci algorithm with an O(log n) fast doubling algorithm.

Key Performance Improvements:

  1. Algorithmic Complexity Reduction: The original code performs n-2 iterations with addition operations. The optimized version reduces this to approximately log₂(n) iterations by using the mathematical fast doubling formulas:

    • F(2k) = F(k) × (2×F(k+1) - F(k))
    • F(2k+1) = F(k+1)² + F(k)²
  2. Bit Manipulation Efficiency: The optimization processes the binary representation of n bit-by-bit (starting from the highest bit), allowing it to "double" its way to the result exponentially faster than linear iteration. For example, computing F(1000) requires ~10 iterations instead of 998.

  3. Constant Space with Minimal Operations: Both implementations use O(1) space, but the optimized version performs fewer total arithmetic operations for larger n values. The bit shift operation (b << 1) for doubling is also faster than explicit multiplication.

Performance Characteristics:

  • For small n values (< 20), the overhead of bit manipulation may make performance similar to the original
  • For medium to large n values (≥ 30), the logarithmic advantage becomes increasingly significant
  • The 10% speedup measured suggests the test workload includes sufficiently large Fibonacci numbers where the O(log n) complexity provides measurable gains

Trade-offs:

The optimized code is slightly more complex to understand due to the mathematical doubling formulas and bitwise operations, but this is a reasonable trade-off for the consistent runtime improvement, especially as n scales.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 12 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 🔘 None Found
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage No coverage data found for fibonacci
⚙️ Click to see Existing Unit Tests

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-Algorithms.fibonacci-mlbf0man and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimized code achieves a **10% runtime improvement** (from 4.23ms to 3.82ms) by replacing the O(n) iterative Fibonacci algorithm with an O(log n) fast doubling algorithm.

**Key Performance Improvements:**

1. **Algorithmic Complexity Reduction**: The original code performs n-2 iterations with addition operations. The optimized version reduces this to approximately log₂(n) iterations by using the mathematical fast doubling formulas:
   - F(2k) = F(k) × (2×F(k+1) - F(k))
   - F(2k+1) = F(k+1)² + F(k)²

2. **Bit Manipulation Efficiency**: The optimization processes the binary representation of n bit-by-bit (starting from the highest bit), allowing it to "double" its way to the result exponentially faster than linear iteration. For example, computing F(1000) requires ~10 iterations instead of 998.

3. **Constant Space with Minimal Operations**: Both implementations use O(1) space, but the optimized version performs fewer total arithmetic operations for larger n values. The bit shift operation (`b << 1`) for doubling is also faster than explicit multiplication.

**Performance Characteristics:**

- For small n values (< 20), the overhead of bit manipulation may make performance similar to the original
- For medium to large n values (≥ 30), the logarithmic advantage becomes increasingly significant
- The 10% speedup measured suggests the test workload includes sufficiently large Fibonacci numbers where the O(log n) complexity provides measurable gains

**Trade-offs:**

The optimized code is slightly more complex to understand due to the mathematical doubling formulas and bitwise operations, but this is a reasonable trade-off for the consistent runtime improvement, especially as n scales.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from aseembits93 February 6, 2026 21:46
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: Medium Optimization Quality according to codeflash labels Feb 6, 2026
@aseembits93 aseembits93 closed this Feb 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: Medium Optimization Quality according to codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant