Skip to content

Conversation

@misrasaurabh1
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

  • Java function qualified names now include the package prefix
  • Ensures consistent fully-qualified naming for Java functions in markdown output and PR descriptions

Problem

When codeflash generates PR descriptions or explanations, Java functions appeared as:

  • Calculator.fibonacci instead of com.example.Calculator.fibonacci

This made function references ambiguous, especially in large projects with multiple classes having the same name in different packages.

Solution

Include the package in the parents tuple when discovering Java functions:

  • Package (type="package") - e.g., "com.example"
  • Class (type="ClassDef") - e.g., "Calculator"

The qualified_name property automatically builds the full path from parents.

Before

Buffer.bytesToHexString

After

com.aerospike.client.command.Buffer.bytesToHexString

Test plan

  • Added TestQualifiedNameWithPackage test class with 4 test cases:
    • test_qualified_name_includes_package - basic package inclusion
    • test_qualified_name_with_nested_package - deeply nested packages
    • test_qualified_name_without_package - default package behavior preserved
    • test_parents_include_package_and_class - verify parent structure
  • All existing discovery tests still pass

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Java function qualified names now include the package prefix for
proper identification in markdown output and PR descriptions.

Before: "Calculator.fibonacci"
After:  "com.example.Calculator.fibonacci"

This ensures consistent fully-qualified naming for Java functions
similar to how Python functions include their module path.

The parents tuple now includes:
1. Package (type="package") - e.g., "com.example"
2. Class (type="ClassDef") - e.g., "Calculator"

Functions without a package declaration maintain the previous
behavior (just class.method).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants