⚡️ Speed up function list_remove_range by 12%
#115
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 12% (0.12x) speedup for
list_remove_rangeinaerospike_helpers/operations/list_operations.py⏱️ Runtime :
28.0 microseconds→25.0 microseconds(best of5runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves an 11% runtime improvement by eliminating a conditional dictionary mutation in favor of constructing the complete dictionary in a single operation.
Key optimization:
Instead of always creating a base 4-key dictionary and then conditionally adding the
CTX_KEYvia assignment (op_dict[CTX_KEY] = ctx), the optimized version uses branching to construct the appropriate dictionary size upfront—either 5 keys whenctxis truthy or 4 keys when it's falsy.Why this is faster:
Eliminates dictionary mutation overhead: Dictionary assignments in Python require hash computation, collision handling, and potential resizing checks. By avoiding the
op_dict[CTX_KEY] = ctxmutation, we skip this overhead entirely.Better memory locality: Creating the dictionary with all keys at once allows Python's dictionary implementation to allocate the right size immediately, avoiding the resize operation that might occur when adding a 5th key to a 4-key dictionary.
Fewer dictionary operations: The original performs 1 creation + 1 conditional assignment (2 operations in the
ctxcase), while the optimized version performs just 1 creation operation regardless of the branch taken.Test case performance patterns:
ctxprovided show the strongest improvements (18.5-22.9% faster):test_with_non_empty_ctx_included_and_identity_preserved,test_with_empty_ctx_omitted,test_large_ctx_list_scalability. These benefit most from eliminating the dictionary mutation.ctxshow modest improvements (4-7% faster):test_with_none_ctx_omitted,test_bin_name_edge_cases_and_key_integrity. These benefit from optimized dictionary construction even though they already avoided the mutation path.test_basic_creation_minimal, 1.77% regression) is within measurement noise and doesn't affect the overall 11% runtime gain.This optimization is particularly valuable if
list_remove_rangeis called frequently in data pipeline operations, as the per-call savings compound over many invocations.✅ Correctness verification report:
⚙️ Click to see Existing Unit Tests
test_nested_cdt_ctx.py::TestCTXOperations.test_ctx_list_remove_rangetest_nested_cdt_ctx.py::TestCTXOperations.test_ctx_list_remove_range_negative🌀 Click to see Generated Regression Tests
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-list_remove_range-ml0mibhiand push.