Bump to bcvk 0.7.0

[cgwalters]

No description provided.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @cgwalters, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the bcvk dependency to version 0.7.0 across the project's build and development environments. This ensures that the latest features and fixes from bcvk are utilized in both the GitHub Actions workflow for Ubuntu setup and the Debian-based development container, maintaining consistency and leveraging recent improvements.

Highlights

• GitHub Actions bcvk Version Update: The BCVK_VERSION environment variable within the bootc-ubuntu-setup GitHub Action has been updated from 0.6.0 to 0.7.0.
• Debian Containerfile bcvk Version Update: The bcvkversion argument in the devenv/Containerfile.debian has been updated from v0.5.3 to v0.7.0.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the bcvk version to 0.7.0 in two places. The changes are correct and align the versions used in the GitHub Action and the development Containerfile. I've added a couple of suggestions to improve long-term maintainability by making the version management more consistent and automated.

[gemini-code-assist]

This version is hardcoded. To improve maintainability and ensure it's updated automatically in the future, it would be beneficial to make it manageable by Renovate. You could add a # renovate: ... comment on the line above this one, similar to how it's done in devenv/Containerfile.debian. This would require a corresponding regex manager configuration in renovate-shared-config.json to parse shell variable exports.

[gemini-code-assist]

I've noticed an inconsistency in how the bcvk version is specified. Here it is v0.7.0 (with a v prefix), while in common/.github/actions/bootc-ubuntu-setup/action.yml it is 0.7.0 (without a v prefix). While the surrounding code in each file correctly handles its format, using a consistent format (e.g., always with the v prefix) would improve clarity and reduce potential errors in the future. Since Renovate is configured for this file and uses the v prefix, it might be best to adopt this format in the action.yml as well (which would require a small change where the variable is used).