Skip to content

Fix type passed into BOOST_MATH_NOEXCEPT() in specialization of epsilon(). #14

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
jzmaddock merged 1 commit into from
Sep 9, 2015
+1 −1
Merged

Fix type passed into BOOST_MATH_NOEXCEPT() in specialization of epsilon(). #14

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion include/boost/math/tools/precision.hpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ inline BOOST_MATH_CONSTEXPR T epsilon(const mpl::true_& BOOST_MATH_APPEND_EXPLIC

#if defined(__GNUC__) && ((LDBL_MANT_DIG == 106) || (__LDBL_MANT_DIG__ == 106))
template <>
inline BOOST_MATH_CONSTEXPR long double epsilon<long double>(const mpl::true_& BOOST_MATH_APPEND_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE(long double)) BOOST_MATH_NOEXCEPT(T)
inline BOOST_MATH_CONSTEXPR long double epsilon<long double>(const mpl::true_& BOOST_MATH_APPEND_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE(long double)) BOOST_MATH_NOEXCEPT(long double)
{
// numeric_limits on Darwin (and elsewhere) tells lies here:
// the issue is that long double on a few platforms is
Expand Down